The Plusnet pipe of doom and the users (OH DEAR!)

Discussion in 'Broadband' started by Dave, Nov 29, 2004.

  1. Dave

    Dave Guest

    Well it looks SO FAR that I was right with regards to the heavy users
    ending up being limited in speed terms, and contended take a look at...
    http://tinyurl.co.uk/o2kz
    The funniest quote IMO is about the "bedding in" process LMFAO sorry PN
    (and Ian) but first no GB figure was given to users to reduce their usage
    to and now that comment, WTF?
    While I freely admit you may be working on any issues that have occurred
    due to the moving of users to different pipes, I don't think in a
    reputation state things like this will do you any good either now or in the
    future, I suspect your phone lines will/are being inundated with unhappy
    users, who want it sorted at the least and want a MAC code at the worse.
    Im certainly happy I aint a PN user at this moment in time, and with more
    and more ISPs now running BTs trial 2mb service I suspect you might lose
    more than a few users over this latest episode :(((
     
    Dave, Nov 29, 2004
    #1
    1. Advertisements

  2. Dave

    Bob Eager Guest

    What on earth do these mangled words mean?
    'least' is opposite to 'worse' in your juvenile world?
    I had no idea they were trialling a 2 millibit service.
     
    Bob Eager, Nov 29, 2004
    #2
    1. Advertisements

  3. Dave

    Lurch Guest

    Apparently Tiscali are at the forefront of it all....
     
    Lurch, Nov 29, 2004
    #3
  4. Dave

    Bob Eager Guest

    So I believe. Although someone else leaked it a couple of weeks ago...!
     
    Bob Eager, Nov 29, 2004
    #4
  5. Dave

    Ian Guest

    Are you sure you are not referring to the Tiscali 2µb service....same
    price but even 10¯³ slower


    Ian
     
    Ian, Nov 29, 2004
    #5
  6. Dave

    Dave Guest

    Oh the insults of language again, Very original you dumb fanboy
    ZZZZZzzzzzzzzzz
     
    Dave, Nov 30, 2004
    #6
  7. Dave

    Dave Guest

    Look at the fanboys go LMFAO.............ATTACK, ATTACK, LOL *over and
    over*
     
    Dave, Nov 30, 2004
    #7
  8. LOLOLOLOLOLOLOL.

    Were you /really/ LOL'ing, Dave? You LOL at lot. Were you also LYAO?
     
    Richard Sobey, Nov 30, 2004
    #8
  9. Dave

    Dave Guest

    Erm "LOL'ing"??????????
     
    Dave, Nov 30, 2004
    #9
  10. If you managed to post in english, perhaps we wouldn't be able to take
    the piss. Your comment above is utterly incomprehensible.
     
    Mark McIntyre, Nov 30, 2004
    #10
  11. Dave

    Dave Guest

    Sorry, what is "english"??
    Did you mean "English"? Or something else?
     
    Dave, Dec 1, 2004
    #11
  12. Yes, you do know what LOL means, don't you? After all, you seem to use
    the acronym in the majority of your posts.
     
    Richard Sobey, Dec 1, 2004
    #12
  13. Dave

    Dave Guest

    Er yes I do, and putting 'ING' on the end of the last word, makes no sense
    IDIOT.
     
    Dave, Dec 2, 2004
    #13
  14. Not sure why I'm wasting my time really:

    LOL
    Laugh Out Loud
    LOL'ing
    Laugh(ING) out loud.

    You see? Do you see now?
     
    Richard Sobey, Dec 2, 2004
    #14
  15. Dave

    Dave Guest

    Yes you technically meant 'L'ingOL' NOT 'LOL'ing' cos as you had it that
    would mean 'Laugh out loudING' wouldnt it?
    In fact whether i am trying to say...
    Laugh Out Loud
    or
    Laughing Out Loud, its still only 'LOL' what is used, there is no need at
    all for any 'ING' lark.
    Heres a clue for you, type acronym into google to see how wrong you were.
    as for me from this im..
    AVHBI
    *PS that probably another you will just have to look up eh?*
     
    Dave, Dec 2, 2004
    #15
  16. Thanks, but are you sure you can do without yours?
    I'm not exactly sure what this will prove.
    I did have to look it up, yes. ATAAMMVTI, though.

    Ah, now you have to look that up, don't you.
     
    Richard Sobey, Dec 2, 2004
    #16
  17. OMG

    You're replying to the Troll "dave" aren't you? Most people in here have kf'd him by
    now. You've got to realise he is *desperate* for communications and replies, hence
    his insolent responses to the majority of intelligent and decent people who post in
    here.

    The REAL joke is that he spends all his time whinging about PlusNet, but not only is
    he not a PlusNet user - he's not even on broadband!! He must be the only dialup
    whittering about a bb service!

    Best thing would be that we all kf him, then he will eventually go away, and get his
    crayons out again.



    --
    The reply to email address is a valid address of a
    proven spammer, quoted with the sole intention of
    generating spam for them.
    If you'd like to reply to me, then please
    use the newsgroup.
     
    Andrew Sayers, Dec 2, 2004
    #17
  18. Dave

    Dave Guest

    Dunno, but you seem to be in greater need
    It will prove that whether i meant "Laugh Out Loud" or "Laughing Out Loud"
    there is no 'ing' added anywhere to the LOL acronym.
    both "Laugh Out Loud" or "Laughing Out Loud" only use "LOL", not 'LOL'ing'
    or whatever twisted imaginary rubbish it was you came up with.
    Hmm it would appear from
    http://www.acronymfinder.com/af-query.asp?String=exact&Acronym=ATAAMMVTI&Fi
    nd=Find which knows 373,000+ acronyms that yours does not exist. Are you
    sure you typed it right?? Perhaps it needs a space??? Or perhaps its like
    you 'LOL'ing' acronym and doesnt even technically exist??? {snigger, LMFAO}
    Quite frankly it makes no difference. Like i suspected it doesnt exist MR
    'LOL'ing' BOY
     
    Dave, Dec 3, 2004
    #18
  19. Dave

    Dave Guest

    {His regular, 5 year old ADHD like screaming fit}
    It appears now that we have...
    Andrew, Bob and Tx2, sitting in a Tree, bee'hatching, whining and moaing at
    me.
    LMFAO
    Poor little Fanboys.
     
    Dave, Dec 3, 2004
    #19
  20. Hehe...was thinking about doing this yesterday. 25pc of my uk.t.b
    database is Dave - I'd say that's a new record :)
     
    Richard Sobey, Dec 3, 2004
    #20
    1. Advertisements

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.