laptop shows connection is excellent, but I can't get on the internet

Discussion in 'Wireless Internet' started by JamesB, Sep 11, 2004.

  1. JamesB

    JamesB Guest

    I have a wireless connectin to my laptop. I am using a DLINK 614+
    router, with a DLINK DWL 650+ air card in my laptop. My laptop is
    running Windows XP.

    I have been able to get on the internet for about 6 months, up until
    last week.
    Then all of a sudden, I cannot connect with my laptop.

    I also have my desktop connected directly to my cable modem. The
    internet connection works fine for my desktop. But I cannot get my
    laptop to open up any web pages.

    The connection to my laptop shows "Excellent Connection". But when I
    try to open up Internet explorer, it does not open up any web pages.

    My firewall is currently enabled. I even tried disabling the firewall,
    but that didn't work.

    Any ideas??
    I am not a computer guru. So what is the simple way to fix this
    JamesB, Sep 11, 2004
    1. Advertisements

  2. JamesB

    Duane Arnold Guest

    (JamesB) wrote in
    If IPconfig /all results in a 169 IP being returned, then the computer is
    having trouble getting an IP from the router's DHCP server and it cannot
    connect to the Internet. This may be due to some mis-config of the NIC or
    XP's Wireless Zero Configuration Service could be causing problems and my
    need to be disabled.

    If the machine is getting the 169 IP and after doing a reboot or IPconfig
    /release and Ipconfig /renew at the DOS Command Prompt and the 169 IP
    doesn't release, then you may need to reset the TCP/IP Stack on XP to
    release it.;EN-US;Q299357&

    Duane :)
    Duane Arnold, Sep 11, 2004
    1. Advertisements

  3. JamesB

    Al Dykes Guest

    Thanks. I'll read the URL, but the XP laptop works fine when carried to
    a location with public WiFi, and the laptop that is still at the
    location is a w2k system, so AIAIK, doesn't have Zero Config.

    Both machines are auto-configuring to a 169 IP.
    Al Dykes, Sep 11, 2004
  4. Oh-oh. You can run your network using all IP
    addresses, but you may get some suprises. The IP
    address block is reserved by Microsloth for IP addresses the computah
    defaults to when it cannot get an IP address from a DHCP server. The numbers are random. If you're running with
    addresses, then it's highly likely that you only have
    as an IP address for the computah, but for the default gateway
    and DNS servers. You can network like that between two computahs, but
    you're not going to surf anywhere on the internet without a gateway
    and DNS servers. You can see all the addresses with:
    Start -> Run
    ipconfig /all | more

    Worse, your Windoze XP laptop is very persistant. If you go to a
    coffee shop hot spot and connect successfully, you will get an IP
    address of (or something similar) from a DHCP server.
    When you get back home, XP will try to use this IP address until you
    either disable/enable the card, or kick start a DHCP request with:
    ipconfig /release
    (wait a while)
    ipconfig /renew

    There are a few other suprises but they're minor and can be ignored.
    However, methinks that running a network with
    addresses is a bad idea.

    So, the big question is why are you not getting an IP address from the
    DHCP server in the router? DHCP might be turned off, misconfigured,
    or just plain broken. Hard to tell from here. Another possibility is
    that the encryption on your wireless link has changed. If this is
    the case, you'll get a good signal indication, but you won't be able
    to connect to the web server in the router. I have a bunch of other
    guesses but mangled WEP/WPA are the usual culprits.

    Start this exercise with a desktop (or laptop) plugged directly into
    the DI-614+ router. No wireless involved. Make sure that the DHCP
    server is working and that your desktop is getting a real IP address,
    gateway, and DNS server, and *NOT* the default IP.

    Once the router is working for a wired connection, troubleshoot the
    wireless part. If the WEP/WPA encryption seems to be the issue,
    disable encryption in both the DI-614+ router and client radios. Once
    that's working, turn it back on and make sure everyone is using the
    same WEP key or WPA shared key.
    Jeff Liebermann, Sep 11, 2004
  5. FWIW its not reserved by MS. Its reserved by international standard. Blame
    MS for many things, but not this.
    Mark McIntyre, Sep 12, 2004
  6. JamesB

    Duane Arnold Guest

    Oh, I think if you went and looked at the Services for Win 2K, you'll
    find the Wireless Zero Configuration Service is on the Win 2K O/S and
    it's disabled be default on Win 2K.

    If the machine is getting the 169 IP and after doing a reboot or IPconfig
    /release and Ipconfig /renew at the DOS Command Prompt and the 169 IP
    doesn't release, then you may need to reset the TCP/IP Stack on XP to
    release it.


    If the 169 IP is present, then the machine cannot get an IP from a DHCP
    server on the router due to some mis-configuration or something is
    defective with equipment and the machine is timing out. That is a
    reserved IANA IP that's being assigned to the NIC that indicates the
    condition, along with the *auto-config* message. The IP will allow the
    machine to access other machine on the LAN but the IP will not allow
    access to the WAN.

    Duane :)
    Duane Arnold, Sep 12, 2004
  7. RFC3330. See: - This is the "link local" block. It is allocated for
    communication between hosts on a single link. Hosts obtain these
    addresses by auto-configuration, such as when a DHCP server may not
    be found.

    Also known as Automatic Private IP Addressing (APIPA) by Microsoft.
    To the best of my knowledge, Microsloth was the first to actually use
    this "feature". I think I wasted a day dealing with a W2K server
    routing problem until I found this:
    Someone had setup a company full of workstations plus a server on rather than bothering to get a DCHP server working
    properly. That sorta worked until they needed to connect to the
    internet, and there was no default route or DNS. I can't blame
    Microsoft for inventing this abomination, but I certainly can blame
    them for implimenting it.
    Jeff Liebermann, Sep 12, 2004
  8. JamesB

    Quaoar Guest

    Google for the two apps lspfix.exe and winsockxpfix.exe. Run both in
    default mode.

    Quaoar, Sep 12, 2004
  9. JamesB

    Duane Arnold Guest

    How are you going to blame MS for something someone implemented that
    cause you some pain? ;-)

    Duane :)
    Duane Arnold, Sep 12, 2004
  10. Win2K doesn't have any native builtin wireless support of the sort that WZC
    offers. It may be in the APIs but not in the OS.
    Mark McIntyre, Sep 12, 2004
  11. JamesB

    Duane Arnold Guest

    The fact that is there and it can be activated as a service on Win 2K means
    one can do something with it. I never bothered doing it and do not use WZC
    on XP either, because it's a PITA and nothing but trouble with my first
    encounter with it. It was quickly disabled.

    Duane :)
    Duane Arnold, Sep 12, 2004
  12. No problem can be solved without first assigning the blame.
    Suffering always precedes enlightenment.

    Actually, I offer thanks to Microsoft for such abominations that
    support my decadent and lavish lifestyle. If Microsoft had done it
    right, I would be out of business and back to repairing sewing
    machines, chain saws, and radios. I might also be forced to get one
    of those "job" things. As long as such features have unexpected side
    effects, glitches, do weird things, and change themselves without
    notice, my chosen career path is secure.

    On my business card and stationary is the company motto:
    "If this stuff worked, you wouldn't need me"
    Jeff Liebermann, Sep 12, 2004
  13. JamesB

    Duane Arnold Guest

    I gald you see that it's just a job and M$ generates revenue! Too many
    people take the M$ thing to the deep-end. ;-)

    Duane :)
    Duane Arnold, Sep 12, 2004
  14. YMMV, but its not MS's (or the RFC writer's) fault if you don't actually
    know how DHCP works. IMHO its quite handy knowing that you have a DHCP

    And frankly its hardly an abhomination, when something works as per the
    standard. And there was someone earlier rabbiting on about nonstandard
    Mark McIntyre, Sep 13, 2004
  15. Someone else setup that dynamic IP network without a DHCP server. I
    was the one that fixed it. Incidentally, that was in the days of NT4,
    where one release of the MS DHCP server faithfully would give out the
    servers IP address and corrupted its own database on a regular basis.
    The backup DHCP server system never did work right until W2K. Things
    have much improved since then.

    There is some truth to me not knowing how DHCP works. This was the
    topic of discussion a few weeks ago, over how the cheap routers manage
    to remain RFC2131 compliant without a saved database or cache that
    will survive a power cycle. The static DHCP assignments are retained
    in the non-volatile configuration memory, but the dynamic DHCP
    assignments seem to be lost on power cycle. In my spare time, I've
    been sniffing the traffic trying to determine how these really work
    and how it verifies that an IP address has not been previously
    supplied after a power cycle. I'm not ready to offer any revelations,
    but I certainly have some odd behavior and creative implementations of

    RFC2131 states:
    that the DHCP server *MUST*:

    - Retain DHCP client configuration across DHCP client reboot. A
    DHCP client should, whenever possible, be assigned the same
    configuration parameters (e.g., network address) in response
    to each request,

    - Retain DHCP client configuration across server reboots, and,
    whenever possible, a DHCP client should be assigned the same
    configuration parameters despite restarts of the DHCP mechanism,

    This is obviously not being retained on cheap routers so some other
    mechanism must be involved. Got any info or clues?
    I believe I'm qualified to pass judgment on the value and
    implementation of APIPA. I find it to be useless and generally
    confusing to the user. In my never humble opinion, when DHCP fails,
    methinks it should fail completely, and not offer a bogus IP address
    and no default route. The default IP address should be Do
    you know of any useful functions that APIPA performs? I can think of
    a few obscure and contrived situations where it might be useful, but
    offhand, I can't think of anything it does but create confusion.
    Jeff Liebermann, Sep 13, 2004
    1. Advertisements

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.