Zen

ISPreview selects Zen as Best Quality ISP

19 January 2009: ISPreview has looked back over the performance of
ISPs throughout 2008, irrespective of size, and reviewed them on
reliability, price and performance. The review was based on the
editor’s own observations of the market. As a result the editor has
selected Zen Internet as the Best Quality ISP (Consumer and Business).
Selection should not be considered an award.

"Walter" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:(E-Mail Removed)...
> ISPreview selects Zen as Best Quality ISP
>
> 19 January 2009: ISPreview has looked back over the performance of
> ISPs throughout 2008, irrespective of size, and reviewed them on
> reliability, price and performance. The review was based on the
> editor's own observations of the market. As a result the editor has
> selected Zen Internet as the Best Quality ISP (Consumer and Business).
> Selection should not be considered an award.
>

Reviews are based on which advertiser pays the biggest bill.
That is why it is in "his" opinion only with no real survey.
I wouldn't rate Zen for home users and certainly NOT for business
use. Look at how many don't use them!

Walter wrote:

> ISPreview selects Zen as Best Quality ISP

And who the fuck are "ISPreview" ?

Some clowns even thought NTL was the best. It's the size of the envelope
that goes in your back pocket that counts.

The only reviews of value are ones by users.

Graham

"Gizmo." wrote:

> "Eeyore" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote
> > Walter wrote:
> >
> >> ISPreview selects Zen as Best Quality ISP
> >
> > And who the fuck are "ISPreview" ?
> >
> > Some clowns even thought NTL was the best. It's the size of the envelope
> > that goes in your back pocket that counts.
>
> ooohhh Mr Cynical ;o)
>
> > The only reviews of value are ones by users.
>
> On a side note.
> You've really rattled Doug Bollens cage !!
> Many thanks from all at uk.transport ;o)

Thanks back ! Yes I thought he deserved it. A decent abuse report works
wonders. ;~)

Graham

"Gizmo." <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:ZrCdl.77893$(E-Mail Removed)2...
>
> "Eeyore" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
> news:(E-Mail Removed)...
>>
>>
>> Walter wrote:
>>
>>> ISPreview selects Zen as Best Quality ISP
>>
>> And who the fuck are "ISPreview" ?
>>
>> Some clowns even thought NTL was the best. It's the size of the envelope
>> that goes in your back pocket that counts.
>
> ooohhh Mr Cynical ;o)
>
>> The only reviews of value are ones by users.
>>
>
> On a side note.
> You've really rattled Doug Bollens cage !!
> Many thanks from all at uk.transport ;o)
>
Well as a user of Zen (and with no other connection with them) I am happy to
say they are good and their customer support is very good in comparison with
Eclipse (my previous ISP) - Roger

Eeyore wrote:
> Walter wrote:
>
>> ISPreview selects Zen as Best Quality ISP
>
> And who the fuck are "ISPreview" ?
>
> Some clowns even thought NTL was the best. It's the size of the
> envelope that goes in your back pocket that counts.
>
> The only reviews of value are ones by users.

Used 'em for years and found the customer support excellent and the service
reliable. As to whether they're "value for money" I couldn't say having not
tried any others.

Tim

Roger wrote:

> "Gizmo." <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
> > "Eeyore" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
> >> Walter wrote:
> >>
> >>> ISPreview selects Zen as Best Quality ISP
> >>
> >> And who the fuck are "ISPreview" ?
> >>
> >> Some clowns even thought NTL was the best. It's the size of the envelope
> >> that goes in your back pocket that counts.
> >
> > ooohhh Mr Cynical ;o)
> >
> >> The only reviews of value are ones by users.
> >>
> >
> > On a side note.
> > You've really rattled Doug Bollens cage !!
> > Many thanks from all at uk.transport ;o)
>
> Well as a user of Zen (and with no other connection with them) I am happy to
> say they are good and their customer support is very good in comparison with
> Eclipse (my previous ISP) - Roger

I seriously considered them myself but I doubt they can match IDNet overall. In
the same kind of leauge though.

Graham

On Wed, 21 Jan 2009 13:05:44 +0000, Eeyore
<(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:

>
>

>I seriously considered them myself but I doubt they can match IDNet overall. In
>the same kind of leauge though.
>
>Graham
>
Judging by your ramblings on this newsgroup I thought you had tried
them all,you seem to suggest they are all crap except idnet who don,t
even have a news server.

Zen must be the tops if you consided them

On Wed, 21 Jan 2009 13:56:25 +0000, Walter <(E-Mail Removed)>
wrote:

>On Wed, 21 Jan 2009 13:05:44 +0000, Eeyore
><(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>
>>I seriously considered them myself but I doubt they can match IDNet overall. In
>>the same kind of leauge though.
>>
>>Graham
>>
>Judging by your ramblings on this newsgroup I thought you had tried
>them all,you seem to suggest they are all crap except idnet who don,t
>even have a news server.
>
>Zen must be the tops if you consided them

should read binary news server

On Wed, 21 Jan 2009 13:56:25 +0000, Walter <(E-Mail Removed)>
wrote:


>Judging by your ramblings on this newsgroup I thought you had tried
>them all,you seem to suggest they are all crap except idnet who don,t
>even have a news server.
They are all crap INCLUDING idnet compaired with Virginmedia Walt
which is why I swiftly returned to Virgin .