ZA and networks

Rather than install ZA on the other PC's as I do not use them for the net.
I sometimes scan via the local network, one was scanned, then decided
to scan the third PC (three partions) but after checking C:\ I then continued
on to D:\ this was OK until I reached a directory containing 895MB of files.

While the rest was OK, this one directory seemed to take forever and never
completely finished it.(even after a couple of hours)
So I was wondering if this was a fault of ZA or the "slow" ISA & coax connections
as I have no real need for a fast network for home use.

Den

In article <bginni$and$(E-Mail Removed)>,
(E-Mail Removed) says...
> Rather than install ZA on the other PC's as I do not use them for the net.
> I sometimes scan via the local network, one was scanned, then decided
> to scan the third PC (three partions) but after checking C:\ I then continued
> on to D:\ this was OK until I reached a directory containing 895MB of files.
>
> While the rest was OK, this one directory seemed to take forever and never
> completely finished it.(even after a couple of hours)
> So I was wondering if this was a fault of ZA or the "slow" ISA & coax connections
> as I have no real need for a fast network for home use.
>
You don't mean ZA, do you?

"Rob Morley" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message news:(E-Mail Removed). com...
>
> You don't mean ZA, do you?

This is what I wondered if it is the ZoneAlarm version 2.1.44 I know it is
an old version but works fine. While I do realise that the ISA/coax is slow,
but never had a problem as file transfer at high speed is not a problem, it just
that I was about to sort identical files before transferring to CD-RW.

Den

In article <bgop1e$ce8$(E-Mail Removed)>,
(E-Mail Removed) says...
>
> "Rob Morley" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message news:(E-Mail Removed). com...
> >
> > You don't mean ZA, do you?
>
> This is what I wondered if it is the ZoneAlarm version 2.1.44 I know it is
> an old version but works fine. While I do realise that the ISA/coax is slow,
> but never had a problem as file transfer at high speed is not a problem, it just
> that I was about to sort identical files before transferring to CD-RW.
>
Sorry, you lost me there.

Rob Morley said this...

> Sorry, you lost me there.

This is the weirdest thread. It sounds like the OP is talking about a virus
scanner.. perhaps?
--
º~ dªv¡d ~º

In article <Xns93CEC5604733Ed4v1d@62.253.162.115>,
(E-Mail Removed) says...
> Rob Morley said this...
>
> > Sorry, you lost me there.
>
> This is the weirdest thread. It sounds like the OP is talking about a virus
> scanner.. perhaps?
>
That's what I thought ... maybe :-)