In article <cfat4d$1gs$(E-Mail Removed)>, Martin
<(E-Mail Removed)> writes
>Dominic wrote:
>
>> Martin wrote:
>>
>>>Bob Eager wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>On Tue, 10 Aug 2004 11:46:39 UTC, "kit" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>Hei, Friends,
>>>>>Pls take a look at this site NOW:
>>
>> <snip>
>>
>>>"You can promote JUICE on the web using safe bulk email."
>>
>> <snip spam>
>>
>>>spamming bustards
>>
>>
>> Talking of bustards, and since this is a UK newsgroup, did anyone else here
>> about the reintroduction of the great bustard to the UK? - flying bird that
>> weighs up to 15kgs!
>
>yes, I saw a report on the BBC a week or two ago. I seem to remember
>them saying it was the heaviest flying bird which suprised me.
>
>Sounds like they could swoop down and snatch the odd ram, never mind a
>lamb lol
>
>The real question is, where are the runways going to be bult so the
>things can get off the ground.
>>
>>
"Uncle Tony" only agreed to their re-introduction because these are
modern "High Tech" Bustards... remember the old ones are extinct in the
UK..... therefore they have been built a bit like their cousins... the
Harriers!! with a Vertical Take off capability ..
so saving "Tony" the money which would have been used for runways:-)
Wally Hayward
Free download. Block SPAM Now!
http://bockspamnow.com/r/5712