On Wed, 09 Nov 2005 13:33:24 -0500,
in article <(E-Mail Removed)>,
(E-Mail Removed)lid (George) writes...
> John Navas wrote:
> > [POSTED TO alt.internet.wireless - REPLY ON USENET PLEASE]
> >
> > In <dknu2e$1e5e$(E-Mail Removed)> on Mon, 7 Nov 2005 16:06:38 +0000 (UTC),
> > (E-Mail Removed) (Caerus) wrote:
> >
> >
> >>Excerpt from Times Online:
> >>November 07, 2005
> >>By Rhys Blakely
> >>
> >>Mobile phones may yet fulfill the potential foreseen
> >>during the dot-com boom, following reports that
> >>Yahoo and Google are to roll out services through
> >>wireless networks.
> >>[SNIP]
> >
> >
> > <yawn>
> >
>
> Agree, most of the dot-com "potential" was just pure hype and spin.
Not really. There were some spectacular failures during the
boom/bust years and people with more marketing prowess than
anything else, who made the whole industry look bad. That
doesn't mean anything online that purports to offer an
interesting service is automatically "bunk".
Also, the way the article reference is written, in a way,
is a return to the "bad days" (publications like "Fast
Company", "Business 2.0" and "Red Herring" come to mind)
where anything remotely connected to the internet, or
data networks is imbued with all sorts of "cool" catchwords
like "3G", and "Dotcom" etc., rather than just talking about
whatever the h*ll the product *does* - and more importantly,
whether it's *useful* or not.
It takes little knowledge or insight to write about Yahoo or
Google. It's like a business writer writing about Walmart:
everyone talks about them, news is everywhere, everyone writes
about them, who cares?
--
* Few people are capable of expressing with equanimity opinions which *
* differ from the prejudices of their social environment. Most people are *
* even incapable of forming such opinions. -- Albert Einstein *
* *
* To send email, remove numbers and spaces: pjkusenet64 @ ekahuna27 . com *
* Simple answers are for simple minds. Try a new way of looking at things. *