"Bruce Chambers" <(E-Mail Removed)3t> wrote in message
news:(E-Mail Removed)...
> RJK wrote:
>> I've been reading some primers on setting up a small home network, and
>> would like to try networking 2 PC's together, via a router? ...using
>> ethernet leads i.e. not wireless :-)
>>
>> They both have XP Home ed. SP3 ...all up to date with MS security patches
>> etc.
>> ...and at the moment, they both get their internet connection from a
>> Linksys WAG354G (which is an adsl modem/4 port router),
>>
>> Can this Linksys do the job, or do I need to buy something different ?
>>
>> Completely confused about hubs, routers etc,
>>
>> regards, Richard
>
>
> It sounds like you've everything you need.
>
> On each WinXP PC, create local user account(s), with non-blank
> password(s), that have the desired access privileges to the desired
> shares. Log on to the other PCs using those account(s), and you will be
> able to access the designated shares, provided your network is configured
> properly. Also, make sure that WinXP's built-in firewall is disabled on
> the internal LAN connection.
>
> Usually, WinXP's Networking Wizard makes it simple and painless --
> almost entirely automatic, in fact. There's a lot of useful,
> easy-to-follow information in WinXP's Help & Support files, and here:
>
> Home Networking
> http://www.microsoft.com/windowsxp/h...et/default.asp
>
> Networking Information
> http://www.onecomputerguy.com/networking.htm
>
> PracticallyNetworked Home
> http://www.practicallynetworked.com/index.htm
>
> Steve Winograd's Networking FAQ
> http://www.bcmaven.com/networking/faq.htm
>
>
> --
>
> Bruce Chambers
>
> Help us help you:
> http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
>
> http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx/kb/555375
>
> They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary
> safety deserve neither liberty nor safety. ~Benjamin Franklin
>
> Many people would rather die than think; in fact, most do. ~Bertrand
> Russell
>
> The philosopher has never killed any priests, whereas the priest has
> killed a great many philosophers.
> ~ Denis Diderot
Many thanks for your response, and links. I can see that I am going to have
do more reading before "having a go." I keep looking at various "simple
diagrams" on networking two PC's, and how to connect things up, and how they
will interface, in relation to how things are set up at the moment,
....and then wonder if it would be easier to disconnect the WAG354G, and
connect the two PC's with a cross-over cable, and try networking them like
that first / for practice, | and then add a pci LAN card to my main PC, (so
that it has a second ethernet port), so that I can connect WAG354G, to get
internet access.
....and then I wonder if it would be simpler to buy a hub, attempt to network
the two PC's, and then connect the WAG354G to the hub, to add in internet
access -...which would leave three empty rj45 ports on the back of the
WAG354G, ...which leads me back to thinking that perhaps the WAG354G could
be doing it all i.e. is a router a hub ? ...i.e. can it act as a hub ?
(I've gathered that a "switch" is better than a hub btw).
e.g. do I need to add 2nd ethernet port to my main PC, and have two rj45
leads going from the WAG354G to the main PC, and one rj45 lead going to the
2nd PC,
....does there have to be two LAN connections set up in XP - one for the two
PC's and one for the internet ? ...is this connected with an "internal" and
an "external network," ???
....anyhow, I'm off to read your links !
regards, Richard