You may want to use netdiag to check any errors.
--
Bob Lin, MS-MVP, MCSE & CNE
Networking, Internet, Routing, VPN Troubleshooting on
http://www.ChicagoTech.net
How to Setup Windows, Network, VPN & Remote Access on
http://www.HowToNetworking.com
"FB" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:58727A1A-0011-4FC3-A7E9-(E-Mail Removed)...
>
> I have a customer with a strange problem: If, in XP, they try to do a
> reverse name resolution (PING -a xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx) of a name in the WINS
> database, the name resolution fails, but in Vista works
>
> When someone try to resolve a name that DOES NOT exist in DNS Zone, the
> reverse resolution DON´T try via WINS, only Via Broadcasts and i could
> prove
> it, by monitoring with NetMon 3.1 and capturing no packets directed to
> WINS
> Servers to try to resolve the name. I could only capture DNS and after,
> Broadcast packets tryingo to resolve teh name.
>
> PC1 - DNSRV1 - AD DNS Zone and WINS(-R) Records created
> PC2 - WINSRV1 - WINS Server with a WINS Server and a Databse full of
> information
> PC3 - XP clients pointing to DNSSRV1 and WINSRV1 in the TCP/Ip Settings
> The environment, is a standard network, with XP, Vista Win2000, 2003
> Servers, a AD 2003-based Domain with its default and common configurations
>
> 1) The DNS and WINS are integrated (there is a WINS and WINS-R DNS Records
> created poiting to WINS Servers (WINS Record) and poiting to the AD domain
> name (WINS-R record) in the Reverse lookup Zone
>
> 2) The XP (and Vista) workstations have TCP/IP are configure via DHCP with
> Hybrid Node option (0x8) and default NetBIOS settings
>
> 3) The Serevrs are configured with the correct TCP/IP Settings (DNS and
> WINS
> Servers)
>
> Why the reverse name resolution is not working? Why in Vista works
> perfectly? The customer will deploy and application that checks the XP
> host
> name (not present in DNS, only in WINS) via Reverse name resolution after
> receive a IP connection and needs to correcly identify the XP to allow the
> connection
>
> To have the XP in DNS database is out of question, the customers want to
> use
> the name resolution process as stated in the general documentation of the
> product (After DNS Cache, Hosts, DNS, try NetBios Cache, WINS (FIRTS),
> Broadcast (AFTER) and LMHOSTS)
>