On Sat, 24 May 2008 07:49:37 -0700 (PDT),
(E-Mail Removed) wrote:
>> Where? *I'm interested.
>
>The FAN6520. From comparing the spec sheets I believe this is a
>replacement for the rt9202.
><http://www.fairchildsemi.com/ds/FA%2FFAN6520A.pdf>
>I'm ordering the FAN6520AMX from mouser, 512-FAN6520AMX.
>
>> Look on the schematics on the data sheet:
>> <http://www.richtek.com/www/Docs/DS9202-08.pdf>
>> Panasonic makes the MA732 diode on the schematic. *Looks like a fast
>> shottky diode.
>> <http://www.datasheetcatalog.com/datasheets_pdf/M/A/7/3/MA732.shtml>
>
>I'll order a some of those too. But looking at the data sheet it has
>the forward voltage at around 0.3-1v. Maybe I'm reading the circuit
>wrong, but doesn't the wrt54g feed 5v through them?
Here I have duplicated a small schematic from my May 23, 2007 post:
(use fixed pitch font)
+------>7705 chip
|
Jack1(+)--L2---F1---+-----+-----+-----+-----|>|--->SMPS(RT9202)
(-) | | | | 0.188V
| +-----+ | | |
| 1000uF| _|_ --- --- ---
L1 16V --- /_\ --- --- ---
| 105° --- | | | |
_|_ _|_ _|_ _|_ _|_ _|_
- - - - - -
ID= DS1 CK1 CA3 C3 D1
Device Zss smt smt smt Zss
ID 33 chip chip chip 33
Match the device name to the input ckt shown in this pic:
<http://web.archive.org/web/20040912091847/seattlewireless.net/~mattw/photos/linksyswrt54g/gallery/fullsize/IMG_3425.JPG>
D1 had Vfwd of 0.188V when I measured my working unit in 2007.
I don't remember if the measurement was taken using a VOM diode test
or if it was taken under actual operating conditions.
Looking at the above pic DS1, D1, & D2 are all the same.
At least DS1 should have survived. Maybe even D1 survived.
I am about 99.9% sure of my ascii schematic.
>
>> >Also, are the FETs possible culprits too? Are they sensitive to higher
>> >voltages?
FETs quite likely are blown.
I never found a data sheet for the FETs, or what they might cross to.
>>
>> It's highly likely that both FET's are also blown. *I had numbers off
>> of those from the board, but I don't have V1 board handy.
>
>From your previous thread you said:
>>The associated FET's are 9965 or 9985. I have not been able to find sources for any of these.
>I'm not sure what the numbers mean. A quick google but didn't produce
>anything useful.
>
In the above pic you can see the RT9202 gate drive leads from pins 2 &
4 going through some low R (<100R) gate drive resistors R5 & R6 to
another SOP-8 device which must be dual FETs.
One of the FETs gate is pin-4.
Trace a few more pins & maybe post a question over in
sci.electronics.repair - someone should know of a cross.
>
>> Ok. *However, I value my time. *What I do is buy the parts, stick them
>> to the unit, and wait until I have some of that mythical spare time to
>> work on it. *Then, I do perhaps a dozen repair jobs at once. *Setup
>> and cleanup time plus finding the parts is what kills me, not the
>> parts cost.
>
>You sound like you are very very busy.
>
>> Duz the new version have a version number? *I'm running v24 RC6.2 on
>> perhaps a dozen local wireless hot spots and business customers, with
>> zero issues. *I haven't tried RC7 yet.
>
>I mean the newer versions of the router. I've got a v5, and v6. They
>seem to need reboots more often than the v1. I'm not sure which
>version of the dd-wrt they are running, maybe a firmware update is in
>order. Those two were harder to get dd-wrt on, so once I had it
>running I didn't try updating.
kc - who just found a V2 with SpeedBooster for $8