It is not possible.
Microsoft DNS is dynamic. It will change "on the fly" when the laptop is put
on the LAN. If it is not then maybe you need to delete the DNS entries and
let them re-create themselves.
On an *individual* machine the DNS lookups are cached for about 30
minutes,...so even if it is correct on the DNS Server, the client may not be
aware of the change. In this context the client is the one making the
connection,...not the one being connected to.
Solution is to make sure the laptops always connect the same way every time
on the LAN. Either always use wired or always use wireless. If you always
use wired while on the LAN then change the SSID or the WPA key for the
wireless so the Laptops quit using it and then have them remove the
"wireless network" from their Prefered Networks. They can use wireless when
they are traveling.
--
Phillip Windell
www.wandtv.com
The views expressed, are my own and not those of my employer, or Microsoft,
or anyone else associated with me, including my cats.
-----------------------------------------------------
"Brad Pears" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:(E-Mail Removed)...
> Many of our company laptops have both a wired and wireless nic built in.
> Both interfaces are used at different times - and the wireless is usually
> disabled when the wires connection is being used. Each if the interfaces
> is assigned an IP address by our DHCP server. The DNS Host A record for
> the laptops changes from time to time as one time it will be the IP
> address of the wireless interface and another time it will be the IP of
> the wired interface.
>
> I have some software that I use and in there I'd like to address the
> laptops by name - and have it work all teh time - no matter how the laptop
> is currently connected. Currerntly, it doesn't always work - becasue the
> IP being returned by DNS is the opposite of what the laptop is actually
> using at that time.
>
> Is there a way to "bridge" (not sure if that is the correct lingo) the two
> connections so that they both use the same ip address - or is this not
> possible?
>
> Thanks, Brad.
>