"Iam Nemo" <(E-Mail Removed)> hath wroth:
>I need to create a wireless USB connection between a computer and a
>device (in this case a digital still camera but it could be a printer,
>etc.). USB2.0 speeds would be nice but I can live with 54mbps. I know
>WUSB is in the works but the range (9m) is not enough and no device is
>available now.
UWB (Wireless USB) from Intel is in the works. It promises really
high speed connections, at very short distances, for devices such as
displays, video, gigabit ethernet, etc.
|
http://www.icron.com/products/usb/co...IcronFS_v4.pdf
WirelessUSB LS from Cypress Semiconductor will sorta do this, but at
fairly slow speeds intended for mice and keyboards. Most of the
products available are for USB to serial (RS-232) wireless converters.
>So what I'm looking for is USB2.0 <--> 802.11b/g converters that I
>could put at each end, one on each device. The signals would come out
>of one USB device and be transmitted wireless through the wireless LAN
>to the other device and converted back to USB, and vice-versa.
If the "devices" at each end are a computer, that can accomidate
Bluetooth or 802.11g wireless, then a simple peer-to-peer network will
do just fine.
>Does that make ANY sense at all? Maybe there are protocol problems I
>don't see... As I said I understand that I wouldn't get USB2.09 speeds
>that way but I can live with that.
It makes sense. You want a wireless USB 2.0 extension cord, where the
"devices" at each end do not participate in the wireless part (no
drivers). Is this correct?
I think this is close but I'm not sure:
http://www.keyspan.com/products/usb/server/
--
Jeff Liebermann
(E-Mail Removed)
150 Felker St #D
http://www.LearnByDestroying.com
Santa Cruz CA 95060
http://802.11junk.com
Skype: JeffLiebermann AE6KS 831-336-2558