"Bob" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:(E-Mail Removed)...
> Don't buy any equipment before the install. Order the service and let
them
> install their modem. If it doesn't work, for whatever reason, I'm 99%
sure
> you won't be out a dime.
Excellent advice. But don't have them install - that costs money. Do
self-install. They will send you the modem and a CD by FedEx. You can get
help if you need it by phone or online (if you have a dialup ISP). My
experience was that the install is trivial. Note that they will negotiate an
activation date with you - you can't install before that date.
>
> As for load coils & bridge taps, SBC will remove those, hopefully before
the
> install date.
Goto
https://dsliot.sbc.com/dsliot/servlet/XMVCController
This will give you a first-cut idea of availability of DSL at your parents'
house. I wouldn't worry about load coils, unless your parents live in the
woods miles from the CO. Bridge taps are easy to find and remove. The
biggest issue will be distance to the nearest DSLAM, which is usually a lot
shorter than distance to the CO.
SBC is offering incredibly cheap Yahoo/DSL bundles. $26.95/month for Basic
or Standard Plus, activation fee rebated. You're locked in for a year, as
you would be with a discounted cable contract, but it's a very attractive
offer. Basic offers "up to 384 kpbs", Standard Plus offers "384 - 1.5 Mbps".
That's a no-brainer. I have Standard Plus and I get 1.2Mbps as measured by
www.pcpitstop.com.
When the contract expires, you have another choice to make. Basic is
$40/month, and offers abysmally slow max bitrate compared to cable. Standard
Plus is $50/month, but at $45/month Roadrunner (at least in my area) offers
superior datarate for $5/month less.
One downside of cable is that they are extremely concerned about how you use
your bandwidth. They only grudgingly support the concept of a household
network running behind a firewalled router, and they monitor your usage
patterns. You can undertand the concern - the "last mile" between you and
the cable headend is shared by a multitude of subscribers. If the
neighborhood node is overloaded, they have to install a new one and split
the load, which costs money. They plan based on statistical estimates of how
much traffic is expected to go through a neighborhood node. If you and a few
neighbors hog it, it might throw the estimate off. DSL doesn't have this
problem - it's a dedicated circuit to the ATM network in the CO. Well, it
goes to fiber at the DSLAM, but there is so much capacity that it doesn't
matter. Security may be another cable issue. I've heard, but not verified,
that it is possible in some cases for subscribers to "see" each directly
through the neighborhood node - for example, mount a neighbor's share, or
use his printer. I do not know that this is true today, but I believe it was
true at one time.
>
> > Also, I haven't really been able to find any reference sheet showing
> > which Linksys or other wireless routers are compatible with SBC DSL.
> > Do you happen to know of a URL to that?
>
> Linksys gear is certainly compatible. I've used it with SBC DSL before,
> with no problem. If you go to their Knowledgebase and do a search on SBC,
> you WIKK find specific instructions for setting up the router's PPPoE.
I'm
> sure other manufacturers have a similar resource.
D-Link is also compatible. For DSL, you need dynamic PPOE support. I'd guess
most vendors support this.
>
> That brings up another point. If you follow my first piece of advice,
they
> will install some PPPoE client software on the PC. That will be required
to
> connect UNTIL you put a router between the computer and the DSL modem.
Then
> the router will handle PPPoE and you can (and should) uninstall their
> software from that PC.
Yes, "there can only be one!" (connection manager, that is).
>
> > Lastly, I've heard Linksys is a bit flakey with the Windows XP OS, and
> > perhaps the drivers aren't so good. Any truth to that?
>
> Works just fine with my work XP Pro laptop with built-in Prism 2.5
wireless.
>
>
> Hope this helps,
> Bob
>
>