Wireless Router/Firewall recommendation?

Looking for a good quality Wireless Router with Firewall.

Just thought I'd leave it at that and ask for recommendations.


TIA,

-Bob

The Letter 'F' wrote:

> Looking for a good quality Wireless Router with Firewall.
>

A wireless NAT router for home usage is not running a FW. It's a simple NAT
device that may or mat not have some FW *like* features.

However, the NAT router is good enough in the home protection by not
forwarding unsolicited inbound traffic to machines on the network.

> Just thought I'd leave it at that and ask for recommendations.
>
>

I use to use a Linksys NAT router 11S4 and there is the 54g. Whatever you
get, make sure it can do logging so that you can use a log viewer so that
you can watch inbound and outbound traffic to/from machines on the network
for dubious connections/activity.

http://www.linksys.com/
http://www.sonic.net/wallwatcher/#routers
http://compnetworking.about.com/od/w...fisecurity.htm

Duane

In article <byEoe.18390$_o.7343@attbi_s71>, (E-Mail Removed) says...
> The Letter 'F' wrote:
>
> > Looking for a good quality Wireless Router with Firewall.
> >
>
> A wireless NAT router for home usage is not running a FW. It's a simple NAT
> device that may or mat not have some FW *like* features.
>
> However, the NAT router is good enough in the home protection by not
> forwarding unsolicited inbound traffic to machines on the network.
>
> > Just thought I'd leave it at that and ask for recommendations.
> >
> >
>
> I use to use a Linksys NAT router 11S4 and there is the 54g. Whatever you
> get, make sure it can do logging so that you can use a log viewer so that
> you can watch inbound and outbound traffic to/from machines on the network
> for dubious connections/activity.
>
> http://www.linksys.com/
> http://www.sonic.net/wallwatcher/#routers
> http://compnetworking.about.com/od/w...fisecurity.htm
>
> Duane
>


Thanks!

Can you FW off various services/ports/sites?

-Bob

The Letter 'F' wrote:

> In article <byEoe.18390$_o.7343@attbi_s71>, (E-Mail Removed) says...
>> The Letter 'F' wrote:
>>
>> > Looking for a good quality Wireless Router with Firewall.
>> >
>>
>> A wireless NAT router for home usage is not running a FW. It's a simple
>> NAT device that may or mat not have some FW *like* features.
>>
>> However, the NAT router is good enough in the home protection by not
>> forwarding unsolicited inbound traffic to machines on the network.
>>
>> > Just thought I'd leave it at that and ask for recommendations.
>> >
>> >
>>
>> I use to use a Linksys NAT router 11S4 and there is the 54g. Whatever
>> you get, make sure it can do logging so that you can use a log viewer so
>> that you can watch inbound and outbound traffic to/from machines on the
>> network for dubious connections/activity.
>>
>> http://www.linksys.com/
>> http://www.sonic.net/wallwatcher/#routers
>> http://compnetworking.about.com/od/w...fisecurity.htm
>>
>> Duane
>>
>
>
> Thanks!
>
> Can you FW off various services/ports/sites?

The ports on the NAT router are closed by default. And since the ports on a
NAT router are closed by default, services running on machines behind a NAT
router are protected. That's until you start doing high risks things like
port forwarding and opening ports on a NAT router exposing a machine
running a service to the public Internet.

I know the 11S4 doesn't have the features you're looking for in a device.
The 54G may be able to do some of it like at the very least WEB filtering.

Other manufacturers of wireless NAT routers are D-Link, Netgear, Belkin, SMC
which are some of the top wireless router manufactures.

What you could do is go to each Website and look at product datasheets and
specs and find one that's going to meet your needs.

Your best bet may be Netgear that would have additional featres that would
come in the ball park of being a NAT router running something like a FW
appliance that meets the specs of *What does a FW do* in the link.

http://www.vicomsoft.com/knowledge/r...irewalls1.html

You can either go up the chain and look t high-end routers that are wireless
or low-end FW appliances that are wireless.

Duane





proping ports
>
> -Bob

In article <YKIoe.18736$_o.3710@attbi_s71>, (E-Mail Removed) says...
> The Letter 'F' wrote:
>
> > In article <byEoe.18390$_o.7343@attbi_s71>, (E-Mail Removed) says...
> >> The Letter 'F' wrote:
> >>
> >> > Looking for a good quality Wireless Router with Firewall.
> >> >
> >>
> >> A wireless NAT router for home usage is not running a FW. It's a simple
> >> NAT device that may or mat not have some FW *like* features.
> >>
> >> However, the NAT router is good enough in the home protection by not
> >> forwarding unsolicited inbound traffic to machines on the network.
> >>
> >> > Just thought I'd leave it at that and ask for recommendations.
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> >> I use to use a Linksys NAT router 11S4 and there is the 54g. Whatever
> >> you get, make sure it can do logging so that you can use a log viewer so
> >> that you can watch inbound and outbound traffic to/from machines on the
> >> network for dubious connections/activity.
> >>
> >> http://www.linksys.com/
> >> http://www.sonic.net/wallwatcher/#routers
> >> http://compnetworking.about.com/od/w...fisecurity.htm
> >>
> >> Duane
> >>
> >
> >
> > Thanks!
> >
> > Can you FW off various services/ports/sites?
>
> The ports on the NAT router are closed by default. And since the ports on a
> NAT router are closed by default, services running on machines behind a NAT
> router are protected. That's until you start doing high risks things like
> port forwarding and opening ports on a NAT router exposing a machine
> running a service to the public Internet.
>
> I know the 11S4 doesn't have the features you're looking for in a device.
> The 54G may be able to do some of it like at the very least WEB filtering.
>
> Other manufacturers of wireless NAT routers are D-Link, Netgear, Belkin, SMC
> which are some of the top wireless router manufactures.
>
> What you could do is go to each Website and look at product datasheets and
> specs and find one that's going to meet your needs.
>
Man, thanks so much!

-Bob

The Letter 'F' wrote:

> In article <YKIoe.18736$_o.3710@attbi_s71>, (E-Mail Removed) says...
>> The Letter 'F' wrote:
>>
>> > In article <byEoe.18390$_o.7343@attbi_s71>, (E-Mail Removed) says...
>> >> The Letter 'F' wrote:
>> >>
>> >> > Looking for a good quality Wireless Router with Firewall.
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >> A wireless NAT router for home usage is not running a FW. It's a
>> >> simple NAT device that may or mat not have some FW *like* features.
>> >>
>> >> However, the NAT router is good enough in the home protection by not
>> >> forwarding unsolicited inbound traffic to machines on the network.
>> >>
>> >> > Just thought I'd leave it at that and ask for recommendations.
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >> I use to use a Linksys NAT router 11S4 and there is the 54g. Whatever
>> >> you get, make sure it can do logging so that you can use a log viewer
>> >> so that you can watch inbound and outbound traffic to/from machines on
>> >> the network for dubious connections/activity.
>> >>
>> >> http://www.linksys.com/
>> >> http://www.sonic.net/wallwatcher/#routers
>> >>
http://compnetworking.about.com/od/w...fisecurity.htm
>> >>
>> >> Duane
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>> > Thanks!
>> >
>> > Can you FW off various services/ports/sites?
>>
>> The ports on the NAT router are closed by default. And since the ports on
>> a NAT router are closed by default, services running on machines behind a
>> NAT router are protected. That's until you start doing high risks things
>> like port forwarding and opening ports on a NAT router exposing a machine
>> running a service to the public Internet.
>>
>> I know the 11S4 doesn't have the features you're looking for in a device.
>> The 54G may be able to do some of it like at the very least WEB
>> filtering.
>>
>> Other manufacturers of wireless NAT routers are D-Link, Netgear, Belkin,
>> SMC which are some of the top wireless router manufactures.
>>
>> What you could do is go to each Website and look at product datasheets
>> and specs and find one that's going to meet your needs.
>>
> Man, thanks so much!
>
> -Bob

No problem

Duane