John Armstrong <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message news:<1iqn4jsd3zrh7$.(E-Mail Removed)>...
> Not quite home networking, but small office.
> Background:
> I know my way round wired networking fairly well, but have never used any
> wireless equipment yet.
> We are looking into getting a network enabled photocopier/printer/scanner
> to replace our aging photocopier.
> The location this will sit isn't particularly close to any existing network
> points and adding one would be disruptive, so I was considering doing this
> wirelessly, possibly using wireless for other devices later as well.
> Unfortunately the copier doesn't have a wireless option, so as I understand
> it the setup would need to be something like:
> Copier ---- Wireless-Ethernet Bridge ~~~~ Wireless access point ---- LAN
>
> Questions:
> Does the above setup look ok?
> Having had a read of downloaded manuals for likely devices, the bridge and
> access point each have their own IP. Is this just used for setup, with them
> all on the same subnet, or is the wireless side a different subnet from the
> wired side with the routing set appropriately? Will each device, including
> the copier be able to get their setup from the dhcp server on the LAN?
> Is wireless security reasonable these days? I could easily put the access
> point into a seperate lan card in one of the linux boxes with locked down
> incoming firewall rules to protect the lan, although that might leave it
> open for somebody nearby to print their backside on our copier...
If you use a pair of wireless-ethernet bridges, the copier will be in
the same subnet as the rest of the LAN. The IP addresses on the
wireless-bridges are used for set-up/management. Also, by using
bridges you will keep the wireless part of the LAN relatively secure
as the bridges won't accept associations from other clients, they will
only communicate with each other.
Pete
|