Networking Forums

Networking Forums > Computer Networking > Windows Networking > Wireless G versus B (Distance) ...

Reply
Thread Tools Display Modes

Wireless G versus B (Distance) ...

 
 
Damon
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      10-18-2004, 06:43 PM
Hello,

I currently have a D-Link Wirelss 802.11g Router (DI-524). I have a
802.11b adapter for my laptop which takes up the only available
cardbus slot. I am moving to a new location, where my wireless router
will be a good ways (possibly outer limits) from the PC.

I need to add USB 2.0 capability to my laptop when I move. So, when I
add a USB 2.0 card, I will need a new way to connect to the network
wirelessly. I was going to get a USB 2.0 Wirless Adapter ...

My concern is surrounding the how well it will pick up the signal. I
see that D-Link has those little USB Key type network adapters ...
that go up to 802.11g technology. But that just doesn't seem like it
would get as good a signal as one of the ones that has a USB cable and
its own little antenna and everything.

D-Link only makes a 802.11b version of standalone -- not a 802.11g. I
saw that Netgear has one that is 802.11g ...

Anyhow: my question is less about the file transfer speed (because it
is being used to connect to the internet at only 256 - 512 kbps
anyway) than it is about the DISTANCE ... any thoughts on which will
get me the best/strongest signal ?

Is there a real difference between 802.11b and 802.11g in terms of how
far it can recieve a signal ?

Thanks,

Damon
 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
 
David D.
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      10-19-2004, 01:39 AM
>Is there a real difference between 802.11b and 802.11g in terms of how
>far it can recieve a signal ?


No. Because if distance is too far, 802.11g switch to 802.11b

 
Reply With Quote
 
daytripper
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      10-19-2004, 01:55 AM
On Tue, 19 Oct 2004 03:39:44 +0200, David D. <dadu@sucre_fondu_et_cuit.fr>
wrote:

>>Is there a real difference between 802.11b and 802.11g in terms of how
>>far it can recieve a signal ?

>
>No. Because if distance is too far, 802.11g switch to 802.11b


And both use 2.4ghz, so they should be equally good/bad wrt distance...
 
Reply With Quote
 
Damon
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      10-20-2004, 02:07 AM
Okay - thanks. I hadn't thought of that in terms of the ghz ... great. Thanks.

DT

daytripper <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message news:<(E-Mail Removed)>. ..
> On Tue, 19 Oct 2004 03:39:44 +0200, David D. <dadu@sucre_fondu_et_cuit.fr>
> wrote:
>
> >>Is there a real difference between 802.11b and 802.11g in terms of how
> >>far it can recieve a signal ?

> >
> >No. Because if distance is too far, 802.11g switch to 802.11b

>
> And both use 2.4ghz, so they should be equally good/bad wrt distance...

 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
WAP versus wireless router Bob Wireless Internet 8 02-15-2008 04:20 AM
Wireless Versus Ethernet Johhny Blogger Wireless Internet 48 09-14-2006 05:21 PM
802.1x wireless versus wired Wimbo Wireless Networks 2 02-13-2006 10:03 AM
802.1x wireless versus wired Wimbo Windows Networking 0 02-08-2006 03:54 PM
2.4G wireless versus bluetooth Gingangooli Wireless Networks 3 02-20-2005 05:28 PM



1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11