In article <(E-Mail Removed)>,
Clive Page <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
>In message <c04rvb$j0t$(E-Mail Removed)>, Gordon Henderson
><(E-Mail Removed)> writes
>>Forget doing it over that distance outdoors unless you are at roof-top
>>level. The power levels allowed on the 2.4GHz kit really don't cut it
>>unless you have genuine line of site. Even then, I'd type "fresnel zone"
>>into google and start reading.
>
>I have no personal experience of this (except to know that my wi-fi kit
>goes through several walls at home with no problems). But the recent
>wi-fi shootout showed some remarkable results. The world record is now
>over 300 km, but that involved amplification. If you use just a clever
>antenna people have managed a few kilometres. Even a Pringles can seems
>to help. See:
>
>http://home.earthlink.net/~wifi-shootout/
Sure. Great distances, but at what data rate? Stunts like that don't
really mean anything in the real world. Stick a window in the way and
it'll halve the data rate. Stick a few walls and you really are down to
the bottom of its limit, and who wants a marginal service at the very
edge of its performance, or a 5 metre dish on a mile-high pole on the
side of their house?
I've helped deploy a commercial wireless broadband service in 3
communities now and it's not that easy. Trust me. You need to spend a
lot of time, money and effort to get it right, then just as you think
you have succeeded, along come the towns CCTV systems which just happens
to use about half your avalable spectrum in the 2.4GHz band )-:
You can use whatever antennae you like, but as soon as you stick a bit
of co-ax in the path and a connector or 2, you've already lost some of
the pathetically weak (due to UK licensing regulations) signal, so
sometimes it's questionable. Look for kit with built-in flat-plate
antennae and it'll often outperform an external antennae, so then your
issue is getting the unit on the roof in line of sight to your next
hop.
Gordon