Networking Forums

Networking Forums > Computer Networking > Windows Networking > Windows Server vs router as DHCP server

Reply
Thread Tools Display Modes

Windows Server vs router as DHCP server

 
 
Gerald Roston
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      03-04-2004, 07:40 PM
I will be migrating a peer-to-peer network of workstations to a local domain
with a Windows 2003 Server machine. Currently, the DHCP service is provided
by our router.

QUESTION: Is it better to have a router provide the DHCP service or should
this service be provided by the server? If the latter is the better option,
how do you set up the new server on the existing network without causing
DHCP conflicts?

Thanks!

--
Gerry Roston
Pair of Docs Consulting
(E-Mail Removed)


 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
 
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      03-04-2004, 08:38 PM
What is the type of router you are using?

"Gerald Roston" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:(E-Mail Removed)...
> I will be migrating a peer-to-peer network of workstations to a local

domain
> with a Windows 2003 Server machine. Currently, the DHCP service is

provided
> by our router.
>
> QUESTION: Is it better to have a router provide the DHCP service or should
> this service be provided by the server? If the latter is the better

option,
> how do you set up the new server on the existing network without causing
> DHCP conflicts?
>
> Thanks!
>
> --
> Gerry Roston
> Pair of Docs Consulting
> (E-Mail Removed)
>
>



 
Reply With Quote
 
Gerald Roston
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      03-04-2004, 09:38 PM
Currently, it is an inexpensive Netgear router with basic firewall
functionality. It is our plan to upgrade this to a more capable device, such
as the Netscreen-5GT plus.

<207.46.248.16> wrote in message
news:(E-Mail Removed)...
> What is the type of router you are using?
>
> "Gerald Roston" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
> news:(E-Mail Removed)...
> > I will be migrating a peer-to-peer network of workstations to a local

> domain
> > with a Windows 2003 Server machine. Currently, the DHCP service is

> provided
> > by our router.
> >
> > QUESTION: Is it better to have a router provide the DHCP service or

should
> > this service be provided by the server? If the latter is the better

> option,
> > how do you set up the new server on the existing network without causing
> > DHCP conflicts?
> >
> > Thanks!
> >
> > --
> > Gerry Roston
> > Pair of Docs Consulting
> > (E-Mail Removed)
> >
> >

>
>



 
Reply With Quote
 
Phillip Windell
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      03-04-2004, 11:04 PM
Well, you can use either one you want, but only use one. Server 2003 may
have more functionality in its implementation of DHCP than the Netgear box
has, and that is what I would personally go with.

The 2003 will also allow DNS, DHCP, and WINS to all work happily together
and things will stay updated more dependably.


--

Phillip Windell [MCP, MVP, CCNA]
www.wandtv.com


"Gerald Roston" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:Oci$(E-Mail Removed)...
> Currently, it is an inexpensive Netgear router with basic firewall
> functionality. It is our plan to upgrade this to a more capable device,

such
> as the Netscreen-5GT plus.
>
> <207.46.248.16> wrote in message
> news:(E-Mail Removed)...
> > What is the type of router you are using?
> >
> > "Gerald Roston" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
> > news:(E-Mail Removed)...
> > > I will be migrating a peer-to-peer network of workstations to a local

> > domain
> > > with a Windows 2003 Server machine. Currently, the DHCP service is

> > provided
> > > by our router.
> > >
> > > QUESTION: Is it better to have a router provide the DHCP service or

> should
> > > this service be provided by the server? If the latter is the better

> > option,
> > > how do you set up the new server on the existing network without

causing
> > > DHCP conflicts?
> > >
> > > Thanks!
> > >
> > > --
> > > Gerry Roston
> > > Pair of Docs Consulting
> > > (E-Mail Removed)
> > >
> > >

> >
> >

>
>



 
Reply With Quote
 
Jeff Cochran
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      03-05-2004, 05:29 PM
On Thu, 4 Mar 2004 15:40:28 -0500, "Gerald Roston"
<(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:

>I will be migrating a peer-to-peer network of workstations to a local domain
>with a Windows 2003 Server machine. Currently, the DHCP service is provided
>by our router.
>
>QUESTION: Is it better to have a router provide the DHCP service or should
>this service be provided by the server? If the latter is the better option,
>how do you set up the new server on the existing network without causing
>DHCP conflicts?


Normally the server, you'll have more control and more options. Keep
from having a conflict by using one or the other, not both. And you
never set the server up with DHCP assigned addresses.

Jeff
 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Windows Server 2008 DHCP Reservations not visible from 2003 DHCP mmc Ckuderna Windows Networking 2 04-02-2009 01:47 PM
Windows DHCP Server Bob Windows Networking 6 04-23-2007 04:06 AM
DHCP Migration from windows server 2000 to windows server 2003 Amr Salah Windows Networking 3 02-04-2007 12:01 PM
windows server 2003 gateway and dhcp server on the same computer boiseneon Windows Networking 3 02-22-2006 05:48 AM
Redhat 9.0 dhcp client & windows 2003 dhcp server: dynamic dns update Mads Ravn Linux Networking 0 06-29-2004 05:27 PM



1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11