In article <FEXqb.103826$9E1.499728@attbi_s52>
(E-Mail Removed)
(Michael O) writes:
>"tom" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
>news:fXRqb.13994$(E-Mail Removed) gy.com...
>
>> OK, there must be some fundumental difference
>> in the ping command that linux uses as opposed to
>> the ping command that Windows uses.
>>
>> Can anyone here elaborate?
>
>Options for
>
>Linux
>
>ping -s [-d] [-l] [-L] [-n] [-r] [-R] [-v] [ -i interface_address ] [-I
>interval] [-t ttl] host [packetsize] [count]
<snip>
>Windows
>
>Usage: ping [-t] [-a] [-n count] [-l size] [-f] [-i TTL] [-v TOS]
> [-r count] [-s count] [[-j host-list] | [-k host-list]]
> [-w timeout] target_name
Another highly visible difference between Windows and Linux pings
is that the number of pings (-n parameter for Windows) defaults
to 4 pings under the Windows version. Unix/Linux ping defaults
to sending packets continuously until interrupted.
--
/~\
(E-Mail Removed)lid (Charlie Gibbs)
\ / I'm really at ac.dekanfrus if you read it the right way.
X Top-posted messages will probably be ignored. See RFC1855.
/ \ HTML will DEFINITELY be ignored. Join the ASCII ribbon campaign!