Yor Suiris wrote:
> Yes it is "old". But, if you want Win9x machines to see stuff on the network
> NetBUIE is want those machines want to use as they too are "old".
>
It's not necessary (for certain) and not advisable (IMHO).
> "CJT" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
> news:(E-Mail Removed)...
>
>>Yor Suiris wrote:
>>
>>
>>>When running Win9x on your network you should install NetBuie on ALL
>>>machines.
>>
>>I disagree strongly. Never install it unless you absolutely need it.
>>Even Microsoft is moving away from it (as you suggest in your next
>>sentence).
>>
>>By default the Win2K and XP do not load NetBuie. Also on the Win9x
>>
>>>machines remove SPX (it was installed by default).
>>>Also Win2k uses DNS for everything. You may want to consider a Win2k
>
> Dynamic
>
>>>DNS for YOUR network. It will make life easier, at least once you set it
>
> up.
>
>>>Although I think the SBS would have done that unless you said No.
>>>Once you have YOUR DNS zone setup point all WSs to it. Also check your
>>>gateway settings.
>>>Oh, (I just re-read this all) you say you can ping the DNS but not
>
> external
>
>>>addresses? So is the DNS server Yours (inside the firewall)? Then you
>
> must
>
>>>set it to forward request to an Internet DNS server (i.e. your ISPs).
>
> Also
>
>>>be sure it is NOT set as a root authority.
>>>Also can you ping by IP and not by Name? Or you can not ping by either?
>
> Did
>
>>>you try TRACERT to see where the packets fail?
>>>Well that should keep you busy for a while. Good Luck.
>>
>>
>>--
>>After being targeted with gigabytes of trash by the "SWEN" worm, I have
>>concluded we must conceal our e-mail address. Our true address is the
>>mirror image of what you see before the "@" symbol. It's a shame such
>>steps are necessary. ...Charlie
>
>
>
--
After being targeted with gigabytes of trash by the "SWEN" worm, I have
concluded we must conceal our e-mail address. Our true address is the
mirror image of what you see before the "@" symbol. It's a shame such
steps are necessary. ...Charlie
|