Networking Forums

Networking Forums > Wireless Networking > Wireless Internet > WiFi Locator

Reply
 
 
Jake
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      08-11-2008, 10:31 PM
Appreciate help in finding a GOOD WiFi detector/locator/finder. Have
the
AG-225H and have tried others. But, would be helpful if directional
information
was available instead of only signal strengfh.. Thanks much..
 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
 
Gator
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      08-12-2008, 07:20 PM
The Oracle has spoken..Thanks much..At eighty-five winters I have
long experience with "microwave." I remember rhumbatrons, klystrons,
maggies etc..I can remember when thirty mega-"cycles" was hard to
get. Turn the tubes upside-down, pull off the base etc..I even remember
goniometers, crystal dectors, air-cell batteries. Have sat hi-speed CW
circuits using "Z" signals, i.e., ZLF ?? Have had about eight
calls..Presently
W6BWY..an OA, KX, etc..I admire the h... out of your background. My
idea of a locator would be dual rotating antennas (phased) synced with
a display of some sort..The problem with finders is that 2.4 Gigs bounces
all over the place and is hard to pin down..Many years ago in
countermeasures
we had antennas on each side of our wings and in those days rudimentary
rotating and supplying signals to amps and indicators, etc. Hawking had one
detector which had some directional ability,,but nothing worth while. 73s
W6BWY


 
Reply With Quote
 
miso@sushi.com
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      08-13-2008, 05:41 AM
On Aug 12, 8:50*am, Jeff Liebermann <je...@cruzio.com> wrote:
> On Mon, 11 Aug 2008 15:31:04 -0700 (PDT), Jake <Gator2...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> >Appreciate help in finding a GOOD WiFi detector/locator/finder. Have
> >the
> >AG-225H and have tried others. But, would be helpful if directional
> >information
> >was available instead of only signal strengfh.. Thanks much..

>
> Direction finding requires a directional antenna. *The problem is
> making it pocket size. *At 2.4GHz, it's actually not that difficult to
> put a parabolic reflector behind the wi-fi detector, and spin it
> around looking for a peak. *
>
> I've built a few prototypes on various frequencies. *For example,
> visualize a typical rubber ducky antenna mounted vertically. *A
> aluminum parabolic reflector, with about the same height as the
> antenna, is mounted on a rotating pivot, with the rubber ducky at the
> center. *Works well enough to determine the general direction, but is
> not good enough to go transmitter hunting, due to side lobes. *For
> that, the antenna will need to be bigger. *It's also rather sensitive
> to reflections and multipath.
>
> I've also built doppler type direction finders, but not at 2.4GHz.
> Unlike my previous rants on the topic:
> <http://www.qsl.net/n9zia/doppler_notes1.txt>
> <http://www.qsl.net/n9zia/doppler_notes2.txt>
> I think dopple has a chance of working with wi-fi because 802.11
> provides an easy method of reporting signal strength from a specific
> radio. *This is a major R&D project and not something I want to
> speculate upon.
>
> So meanwhile, the best suggestion I can offer is to sacrifice a wi-fi
> detector, stuff it into an RF shielded box, and add an external
> antenna connector. *Connect a directional antenna (dish, biquad, yagi,
> patch, whatever) to the connector, and do the transmitter hunting
> thing.
>
> If you must have it pocket size, you might consider using a Windoze
> Mobile cell phone (with wi-fi) or suitable PDA. *See:
> <http://www.aspecto-software.com/rw/applications/wififofum/>
> <http://www.aspecto-software.com/rw/applications/wififofum/screenshots/>
> That's what I use on my Verizon VX6700 phone/PDA/wi-fi/etc.
>
> --
> Jeff Liebermann * * je...@cruzio.com
> 150 Felker St #D * *http://www.LearnByDestroying.com
> Santa Cruz CA 95060http://802.11junk.com
> Skype: JeffLiebermann * * AE6KS * *831-336-2558


The wifi phone works, but using body shielding is required. Mine can
read out the signal strength.

Or do you have something else in mind?
 
Reply With Quote
 
Gator
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      08-13-2008, 01:44 PM
Air Cells were popular in the thirties when people who could
afford a radio lived out where there was no electricity. Acorn
tubes?? You are a newbie...I would not use selsyns, but
instead a sine/cosine array say of four verticals..I did a large
amount of countermeasures around the world..Active and passive..
and really came up with one of the first ways to determine the
range of an unknown signal..My favorite circuit would be a piece
of galena with a needle to find a good spot, an oatmeal box with
wire wrapped around it..a condenser made from Bugler tinfoil,
and a borrowed telephone receiver all inside a cigar box..Later
one with a transistor powered by rectified RF from the local
station in town. FYI in the twenties "peanut" tubes along with
O1A's existed along with type 27 detectors..etc.. I..._._



"Jeff Liebermann" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:(E-Mail Removed)...
> On Tue, 12 Aug 2008 12:20:06 -0700, "Gator" <(E-Mail Removed)>
> wrote:
>
>>The Oracle has spoken..Thanks much..

>
> I can't affort Oracle. I use MySQL instead.
>
>>At eighty-five winters I have
>>long experience with "microwave." I remember rhumbatrons, klystrons,
>>maggies etc..

>
> Egads. That does go back. Don't forget the goniometer, gyrotron, BWO
> (backward wave oscillator), leecher wires, TWT (travelling wave tube),
> Gunn diodes oscillators, tunnel diode oscillators, 1N21 diodes, gas
> tube t/r switches, echo boxes, and a wide variety of antennas that
> defy aethetic considerations. If you know what all these are, you're
> either very old, very experienced, or both.
>
>>I can remember when thirty mega-"cycles" was hard to
>>get.

>
> I switched from megacycles to megahertz in about 1980. However, I
> still use uuF instead of pF for cazapitors.
>
>>Turn the tubes upside-down, pull off the base etc..

>
> Parasitic oscillations? My favorite were acorn tubes. The would work
> no matter how badly I messed up the construction.
>
>>I even remember
>>goniometers, crystal dectors, air-cell batteries.

>
> Ok, you got me on the air-cell battery. Whazzat and where's it used?
>
>>Have sat hi-speed CW
>>circuits using "Z" signals, i.e., ZLF ?? Have had about eight
>>calls..Presently
>>W6BWY..an OA, KX, etc..I admire the h... out of your background.

>
> Got my novice license in about 1963 at age 14. I survived building an
> AC-DC 5 tube radio without getting electrocuted. Everything since
> then has been relatively safe and easy.
>
>>My
>>idea of a locator would be dual rotating antennas (phased) synced with
>>a display of some sort.

>
> Yep. It's also a common technique used by T-hunters in various
> places. 73 Magazine had a series of articles in the Homing-In section
> on the luantic in Santa Barbara, what butchered a perfectly good
> Konel/Furuno marine radar, mounted it on his trash mobile, and
> replaced the dish with a 2 meter 5 element quad-yagi. The rotation of
> the antenna was synchronized with a pair of selsyns to give a circular
> PPI-like display. Nifty idea but more easily implimented using a
> shaft encoder and computah software. (Yet another project).
>
>>The problem with finders is that 2.4 Gigs bounces
>>all over the place and is hard to pin down..

>
> Yep. There are other problems. 2.4 GHz is so crowded, that it's
> going to be difficult seperating xmitters. The best antenna for the
> purpose would be a 24dBi barbeque grill dish, which has a -3dB
> beamwidth of about 7 degrees. That means it can resolve two xmitters
> seperated by more than 7 degrees. Any less, and they combine into a
> common blur. 360 degrees divided by 7 degrees is about 50 stations.
> Netstumbler now finds 20 stations here. Double that to add in the
> clients as Netstumbler only finds access points. So, chances are good
> that you'll see nothing but stations, at any compass point, and not be
> able to resolve or identify a single one.
>
> Remember Dr. R.V. Jones and the Wizard War?
> <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reginald_Victor_Jones>
> One of the German beam following systems he reverse engineered used a
> pair of moderately narrow antenna patterns, switched back and forth at
> a regular rate.
> <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Knickebein_(navigation)>
> <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lorenz_beam>
> I think I can use the same method to obtain a rather narrow beam width
> for a rotating antenna RDF. (Yet another project).
>
>>Many years ago in
>>countermeasures
>>we had antennas on each side of our wings and in those days rudimentary
>>rotating and supplying signals to amps and indicators, etc.

>
> Been there. I help on the AN/SRD-21 "homer". Two antennas and an RF
> switch. Synchronous demodulator driving a zero center meter. The
> Coast Guard vessel goes in circles until the meter centers. I dug the
> design out of an aviation electronics book from the 1930's.
>
>>Hawking had one
>>detector which had some directional ability,,but nothing worth while.

>
> It's all a matter of beam width. The narrower the better. There's
> nothing that can be build that's sufficiently narrow, and will also
> fit in your pocket.
>
> Instead of the traditional dish, it might be possible to use a
> Franklin or AMOS antenna:
> <http://yu1aw.ba-karlsruhe.de/vhf_ant.htm>
> Lots of gain (12-18dBi), 6 degrees vertical beamwidth, 90-120 degrees
> horizontal beamwidth. Rotate the antenna 90 degress and spin it
> around. The 6 degree beamwidth should be as good as a dish and much
> smaller.
>
>>73s
>>W6BWY

>
> Thanks much...
>
> --
> # Jeff Liebermann 150 Felker St #D Santa Cruz CA 95060
> # 831-336-2558 (E-Mail Removed)
> # http://802.11junk.com (E-Mail Removed)
> # http://www.LearnByDestroying.com AE6KS



 
Reply With Quote
 
miso@sushi.com
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      08-13-2008, 04:40 PM
On Aug 13, 8:07*am, Jeff Liebermann <je...@cruzio.com> wrote:
> On Tue, 12 Aug 2008 22:41:16 -0700 (PDT), m...@sushi.com wrote:
> >The wifi phone works, but using body shielding is required. Mine can
> >read out the signal strength.

>
> >Or do you have something else in mind?

>
> I have no mind this morning. *Brain dead would be a good description.
>
> Body blocking sorta works. *I did some random testing in a parking
> lot, to see if I could locate a coffee shop hot spot this way.
> Reflections off vehicles made it all but impossible. *I got my best
> results by walking around the perimiter of the parking lot, and simply
> recording the signal strength. *There was a spectacular rise as I
> walked in front of the coffee shop, but not much else. *
>
> I also tried using a reflector behind the phone. *It wasn't very high
> tech. *Aluminium pie tin with a styrofoam spacer. *That was a bit
> better than body blocking, but again, the reflections were fatal. *The
> added side lobes certainly didn't help.
>
> Unless I missed something in the technique, methinks a directional
> antenna is the only way to do direction finding.
>
> --
> Jeff Liebermann * * je...@cruzio.com
> 150 Felker St #D * *http://www.LearnByDestroying.com
> Santa Cruz CA 95060http://802.11junk.com
> Skype: JeffLiebermann * * AE6KS * *831-336-2558


I for one would like to know where the antennas are located in my cell
phone (wifi and cellular). The same goes for my "SPOT". I assume the
cell phone is designed for the handset to be held vertically.
 
Reply With Quote
 
miso@sushi.com
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      08-14-2008, 03:57 AM
On Aug 13, 11:48*am, Jeff Liebermann <je...@cruzio.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 13 Aug 2008 09:40:44 -0700 (PDT), m...@sushi.com wrote:
> >I for one would like to know where the antennas are located in my cell
> >phone (wifi and cellular). The same goes for my "SPOT". I assume the
> >cell phone is designed for the handset to be held vertically.

>
> Any particular model cell phone?
>
> Remove battery from cell phone.
> Look at serial number tag. *It will have the FCC ID.
> Go unto the FCC ID web site and look at the inside photos.
> There are also web sites that specialize in disassembly and repair
> instructions.
>
> What's a "spot"? *
>
> --
> Jeff Liebermann * * je...@cruzio.com
> 150 Felker St #D * *http://www.LearnByDestroying.com
> Santa Cruz CA 95060http://802.11junk.com
> Skype: JeffLiebermann * * AE6KS * *831-336-2558


Yeah, I forgot about the FCC website.

Regarding SPOT:
http://www.findmespot.com/Home.aspx
I'm not much for being an early adopter, but I got this when it was
new on the market. Thus far it has worked in every hell hole I
explored.

I did the hike to Berry Creek Falls years ago. It was the only place I
ever visited where the GPS just plain failed to work. I suspect the
spot would have trouble there too. Then again, I now have a GPS60,
while back then I was using the eMap.

 
Reply With Quote
 
Gator
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      08-14-2008, 04:01 AM
The majority of my background is airborne. That
pretty well limits what can be used. The system
which proved effective for me involved the use
of computers in light of changing headings, altitudes,
velocities etc..And this was in the fifties and sixties
when we were not far along..BCNU


 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
FS: Canary Wireless HS10 Wifi Hotspot Locator AS-NEW wamanning@email.com Wireless Internet 0 11-02-2008 03:27 PM
WiFi Direction and Locator Dennis Wireless Internet 2 04-24-2007 08:26 AM
Windows Locator - Port 427 NetGoofy Windows Networking 1 03-23-2006 03:58 PM
Wifi transmitter locator flycatcher@gmail.com Wireless Internet 3 12-26-2005 07:11 AM
rpc locator service Steph Windows Networking 0 06-14-2005 04:20 PM



1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11