The popular 802.11b standard would give you a theoretical maximum of
11MB. In reality, probably 7 to 8, depending on encryption, signal,
etc.
802.11a would give you 54MB max, again, drop a percentage of it for
what you'd see in real world use. G would give you the same, but
there are more catches with 802.11g.
Your surfing speeds wouldn't be an issue - you'd never notice, since
your connection will be many times slower than the wireless. But if
you're used to copying large files between the computers, you'll see a
large hit there on time needed.
John
On Tue, 15 Jul 2003 19:38:26 -0400, "Bill Crocker"
<(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
>Should be no problem, as most Wi-Fi setups are still much faster than any
>cable modem connection.
>
>The only health risk I've encountered is staying up too late playing
>UT2003!!!
>
>Bill Crocker
>
>
>"dave" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
>news:Kk%Qa.264403$(E-Mail Removed).. .
>> Hi
>>
>> I am thinking of converting from a cable connecting 2 pc's to wireless, I
>> know what is involved with hardware and installation etc, but I need to
>know
>> if there are any performance issues, ie speed mainly and the health risk
>if
>> any
>>
>> Thanks in advance
>>
>> Dave
>>
>>
>
|