"(E-Mail Removed)" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
>can I connect things like:
>
>Wi-Fi router ==> Wi-Fi network adapter (wl-330g)
>wl-330g ==> hub
>hub ==> computer1
>hub ==> computer2
>
>or is it better to do:
>
>Wi-Fi router ==> Wi-Fi network adapter (wl-330g)
>wl-330g ==> computer1, eth0
>computer1, eth1 ==> hub
>hub ==> computer2
>
>I don't think that the wl-330g has the capability to do that, but...
I don't see what the difference is, as far as what the wl-330g is
being asked to do??
>computer1 has eth0 and eth1. eth0 is where the wl-330g plugs in, eth1
>is where the hub plugs in. both jacks are for regular ethernet cable
This is a more complex arrangement, and requires computer1 to be
on and working any time computer2 is used. Computer1 must also
be able to forward packets (it essentially has to be a router
itself). You may want to avoid that level of complexity.
>the hardware
>============
><http://usa.asus.com/products/communication/wireless/wl-330g/overview.htm>
>some ethernet cable
>one hub
>two computers
It's probably too late now, but there are a number of companies putting
out little wireless *routers* that would be a lot more flexible than
your combination of equipment. The Linksys WRT54G series is the most
popular, but there are several other that are either identical or the
equivalent. Essentially the hub is built into the unit (except they
use a switch, which is even better). Typically they have 1 port labeled
WLAN and 4 ports labeled LAN.
The one downside to those units is that as they come from the factory,
they will not work as a client. But third party firmware is available
and easy enough to load, and allows use in client mode.
--
Floyd L. Davidson <http://web.newsguy.com/floyd_davidson>
Ukpeagvik (Barrow, Alaska)
(E-Mail Removed)