On 2 Jul 2005 13:20:44 -0700, "Eugene F." <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
>Re: Edimax EW-7126
>
>Looked at reviews at NewEgg.com and ordered it.
>
>One of the reviews warned against placing the antenne near monitors.
>What constitutes "near" in practical terms? Does anybody know?
My cat, paperwork, and wireless antenna all compete for space on top
of the monitor. At this moment, the cat is winning.
I think the reviewer probably meant not to place the router near the
monitor. Many potential problems.
1. The electrostatic field from the high voltage can do weird and
disgusting things to circuitry. With today's low voltage logic, it
doesn't take too many electrons piled up on a wire to change logic
states.
2. If your monitor is ancient, it might be belching some x-rays.
They won't be substantial but might be sufficient to create logic
errors in high density memory chips.
3. The flyback transformer has quite a large magnetic field. Most
better monitor have shields around the flybacks, but the cheap ones do
not. Your router might have an inductor or transformer that will
pickup the field from the flyback xformer and induce some garbage into
the circuitry. This is the most likely potential problem.
The reason I say potential is that I consider all the aforementioned
to be highly unlikely with modern monitors. I did have a monitor
where the high voltage lead was almost touching the top of the plastic
case. I placed my cell phone on top of the case. When I reached for
the phone, I felt a slight jolt, where the hi-v arced over to the cell
phone, and then through my body to ground. The phone was dead.
However, that's about as bad as it gets. Unless you do something
similar with a wireless antenna, where the jolt goes through the coax
cable and into the router, I wouldn't worry about proximity to a
monitor.
--
Jeff Liebermann
(E-Mail Removed)
150 Felker St #D
http://www.LearnByDestroying.com
Santa Cruz CA 95060 AE6KS 831-336-2558