Peter wrote:
> On Mon, 09 Jan 2012 12:16:29 +0000, The Natural Philosopher
> <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
>
>> Bruce wrote:
>>> On 08/01/2012 23:05, George Weston wrote:
>>>> Yep - unless you live in a reasonably large town or city (or suburb
>>>> thereof) there doesn't appear to be any light at the end of the tunnel
>>>> for either cable or fibre.
>>>> If you live out in the sticks, as I do, you have to accept that you'll
>>>> get second - or third - rate services.
>>>> I'm quite happy to "enjoy" a 3 Meg ADSL connection, no mains gas and
>>>> frequent power cuts for the tranquillity and low crime rate.
>>>>
>>> Same situation here in Orkney. Microwave links between the islands
>>> means, presumably, no chance of fibre.
>> Not true at all. Large parts of the UK data backbone still run over
>> microwave links. IIRC you can get several Gb/s over a good link.
>
> I don't think so
well state of the art modulation toady is about 1/3rd of the bandwidth
in GHz is used for every Gbps of data rate, so 3Gbps would take about
1Ghz bandwidth which is not inconceivable in a 35GHz microwave link.
Although it is likely that would be multiplexed using several carriers.
e.g. From wiki (
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Millimeter_wave)
"In the United States, the band 38.6 - 40.0 GHz is used for licensed
high-speed microwave data links, and the 60 GHz band can be used for
unlicensed short range (1.7 km) data links with data throughputs up to
2.5 Gbit/s. It is used commonly in flat terrain."
Across a short bit of sea, is relatively 'flat terrain'