In article <jebmd2$atm$(E-Mail Removed)>, David wrote:
> I thought that they had to provide access to every home when the permission
> to be a cable supplier given, I think the number and areas may well have
> been like the original ITV regions.
> Did the Government not write the agreements correctly?
> Is it Ofcom being weak again?
> You can see streets that have had houses built after the original cable
> layers have been and can't get connected. Ends up now with half a street
> can and half can't. This is in Cities, and I suppose rural people loose
> out completely.
I live in an unadopted road and apparently this makes it impossible for cable
companies to supply services without getting every householder to sign a legal
form. Despite several changes of ownership of the cable companies since cable
became available in my area, nobody has made any effort to achieve this.
Many years ago when it all started, some of us received visits from sales
reps, initially expressed an interest and even signed up for a trial period,
only to get a letter a few weeks later informing us that they couldn't supply
the services for the aforementioned reason. Since then, all the cable
companies have regularly sent leaflets trying to persuade us how wonderful the
services are, but nobody has come round trying to persuade anyone to sign the
necessary forms.
Currently I have a good 10Mb/s ADSL service, so unless someone can offer me
something which is either better or cheaper than what I've got, and at least
as reliable, I have no reason to want to change. As long as the companies that
provide such services are only driven by commercial obligations rather than
legal ones, I don't suppose they'll make any effort to change either.
Rod.
--
Virtual Access V6.3 free usenet/email software from
http://sourceforge.net/projects/virtual-access/