Well done Plusnet.

My 2MB connection is zipping along.........

1948.4 Kbps
238.8 K bytes/sec

It is good to see the average user has no problems whatsoever!

On Mon, 29 Nov 2004 13:13:28 -0000, "wooosh" <(E-Mail Removed)>
wrote:

>My 2MB connection is zipping along.........
>
>1948.4 Kbps
>238.8 K bytes/sec
>
>It is good to see the average user has no problems whatsoever!


what did you used to get before?

AL

"wooosh" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:41ab207f$0$33604$(E-Mail Removed)...
> My 2MB connection is zipping along.........
>
> 1948.4 Kbps
> 238.8 K bytes/sec
>
> It is good to see the average user has no problems whatsoever!
>

wow! That's how mine was yesterday and everyday I have been a Plusnet
customer (until this morning of course).

I wouldnt go downloading anything though, Plusnet are not big fans of people
using their connections!

"wooosh" wrote:

> My 2MB connection is zipping along.........
>
> 1948.4 Kbps
> 238.8 K bytes/sec
>
> It is good to see the average user has no problems whatsoever!

I really hope that your name is an indication that this post is ironic and
that you're not a complete numpty.


Dave.

On Mon, 29 Nov 2004 13:22:54 -0000, "Cheddar" <(E-Mail Removed)>
wrote:

>
>"wooosh" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
>news:41ab207f$0$33604$(E-Mail Removed)...
>> My 2MB connection is zipping along.........
>>
>> 1948.4 Kbps
>> 238.8 K bytes/sec
>>
>> It is good to see the average user has no problems whatsoever!
>>
>
>wow! That's how mine was yesterday and everyday I have been a Plusnet
>customer (until this morning of course).
>
>I wouldnt go downloading anything though, Plusnet are not big fans of people
>using their connections!
>
Dont talk crap!

"Phil Bower" <phil@home> wrote in message
news:(E-Mail Removed)...
> On Mon, 29 Nov 2004 13:22:54 -0000, "Cheddar" <(E-Mail Removed)>
> wrote:
>
>>
>>"wooosh" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
>>news:41ab207f$0$33604$(E-Mail Removed)...
>>> My 2MB connection is zipping along.........
>>>
>>> 1948.4 Kbps
>>> 238.8 K bytes/sec
>>>
>>> It is good to see the average user has no problems whatsoever!
>>>
>>
>>wow! That's how mine was yesterday and everyday I have been a Plusnet
>>customer (until this morning of course).
>>
>>I wouldnt go downloading anything though, Plusnet are not big fans of
>>people
>>using their connections!
>>
> Dont talk crap!

Good polite and informative response.

Why dont you give Alex a idea of the kind of usage he is allowed before
getting worried.

On Mon, 29 Nov 2004 18:49:16 -0000, "Cheddar" <(E-Mail Removed)>
wrote:

>
>"Phil Bower" <phil@home> wrote in message
>news:(E-Mail Removed).. .
>> On Mon, 29 Nov 2004 13:22:54 -0000, "Cheddar" <(E-Mail Removed)>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>"wooosh" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
>>>news:41ab207f$0$33604$(E-Mail Removed)...
>>>> My 2MB connection is zipping along.........
>>>>
>>>> 1948.4 Kbps
>>>> 238.8 K bytes/sec
>>>>
>>>> It is good to see the average user has no problems whatsoever!
>>>>
>>>
>>>wow! That's how mine was yesterday and everyday I have been a Plusnet
>>>customer (until this morning of course).
>>>
>>>I wouldnt go downloading anything though, Plusnet are not big fans of
>>>people
>>>using their connections!
>>>
>> Dont talk crap!
>
>Good polite and informative response.
>
>Why dont you give Alex a idea of the kind of usage he is allowed before
>getting worried.
>


Rubbish in...rubbish out

On Mon, 29 Nov 2004 18:47:08 +0000, Phil Bower <phil@home> wrote:

>On Mon, 29 Nov 2004 13:22:54 -0000, "Cheddar" <(E-Mail Removed)>
>wrote:
>
>>
>>"wooosh" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
>>news:41ab207f$0$33604$(E-Mail Removed)...
>>> My 2MB connection is zipping along.........
>>>
>>> 1948.4 Kbps
>>> 238.8 K bytes/sec
>>>
>>> It is good to see the average user has no problems whatsoever!
>>>
>>
>>wow! That's how mine was yesterday and everyday I have been a Plusnet
>>customer (until this morning of course).
>>
>>I wouldnt go downloading anything though, Plusnet are not big fans of people
>>using their connections!
>>
>Dont talk crap!
Well it certainly looks like they don't like customers using their
connections from what I have been reading here over the last few
days .

On 29 Nov 2004 19:36:30 GMT, (E-Mail Removed) wrote:

>On Mon, 29 Nov 2004 18:47:08 +0000, Phil Bower <phil@home> wrote:
>
>>On Mon, 29 Nov 2004 13:22:54 -0000, "Cheddar" <(E-Mail Removed)>
>>wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>"wooosh" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
>>>news:41ab207f$0$33604$(E-Mail Removed)...
>>>> My 2MB connection is zipping along.........
>>>>
>>>> 1948.4 Kbps
>>>> 238.8 K bytes/sec
>>>>
>>>> It is good to see the average user has no problems whatsoever!
>>>>
>>>
>>>wow! That's how mine was yesterday and everyday I have been a Plusnet
>>>customer (until this morning of course).
>>>
>>>I wouldnt go downloading anything though, Plusnet are not big fans of people
>>>using their connections!
>>>
>>Dont talk crap!
>Well it certainly looks like they don't like customers using their
>connections from what I have been reading here over the last few
>days .

They dont like selfish customers using >100Gb/month.......I don't
either because it might just screw up the excellent service I get out
of Plusnet

Good riddance if the 0.3% are not happy. Why dont they all migrate to
Tiscali or Wanadont? I'm sure they won't complain then.

Phil

>>Well it certainly looks like they don't like customers using their
>>connections from what I have been reading here over the last few
>>days .
>
> They dont like selfish customers using >100Gb/month.......I don't
> either because it might just screw up the excellent service I get out
> of Plusnet

Who said 100Gb/month? Where did you get this figure from?