Welcome to 'all.navas.all.the.time'

Tired of 'all.navas.all.the.time' ?

Then insist it stop.




John Navas blathered on, as he has, at least bi-weekly, for months:



> WELCOME ! (self-serving, boring, repetitive trolling)
> <snip>


> NEWS ! (slow, stale, stale, did I mention stale?)
> <snip>


> ALERT ! ("Wolf!", "The sky is falling!")
> <snip>

In article <(E-Mail Removed)>, News <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:

> John Navas blathered on, as he has, at least bi-weekly, for months:
>

Have you heard of "filtering?" Mr. Navas posts that stuff for useful
reasons, if you don't like it, don't fucking read it.
--
W. Oates

On Mon, 04 Jun 2007 18:20:21 -0400 News wrote:

> Tired of 'all.navas.all.the.time' ?
>
> Then insist it stop.
>
Your kill file isn't working?
--
Ernie B.

Communication: The art of moving an idea from one mind to another, hopefully
without distortion.

On Mon, 04 Jun 2007 18:20:21 -0400, News <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:

>Tired of 'all.navas.all.the.time' ?
>
>Then insist it stop.

Why? Because you disagree with his opinions? Perhaps because you
can't operate a newsreader kill file? Perhaps because you're more
concerned about what others think than what you thinK? Perhaps
because you have nothing to offer?

Let us know when you are ready to spend literally weeks working on an
FAQ or spending the time answering peoples questions. It's not easy
and takes considerable expertise. When you can do those, perhaps then
someone might take you seriously.

--
# Jeff Liebermann 150 Felker St #D Santa Cruz CA 95060
# 831-336-2558 (E-Mail Removed)
# http://802.11junk.com (E-Mail Removed)
# http://www.LearnByDestroying.com AE6KS

Its pointless to respond to this jerk. He has nothing to offer the group
but a dislike of Navas, and he hides behind an anonomous address. Best just
to ignore him for the SPAM that it is. As others have mentioned, use the
kill filter. I just added him to mine today.

Ed

While it does get old, it' not as boring as our resident
Anti-Top-Poster/Grammer Policemen can be.

-Larry

"News" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:(E-Mail Removed)...
> Tired of 'all.navas.all.the.time' ?
>
> Then insist it stop.
>
>
>
>
> John Navas blathered on, as he has, at least bi-weekly, for months:
>
>
>
>> WELCOME ! (self-serving, boring, repetitive trolling)
>> <snip>
>
>
>> NEWS ! (slow, stale, stale, did I mention stale?)
>> <snip>
>
>
>> ALERT ! ("Wolf!", "The sky is falling!")
>> <snip>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

On Jun 4, 6:20 pm, News <N...@Groups.com> wrote:
> Tired of 'all.navas.all.the.time' ?
>
> Then insist it stop.
>
> John Navas blathered on, as he has, at least bi-weekly, for months:
>
> > WELCOME ! (self-serving, boring, repetitive trolling)
> > <snip>
> > NEWS ! (slow, stale, stale, did I mention stale?)
> > <snip>
> > ALERT ! ("Wolf!", "The sky is falling!")
> > <snip>

No. Not so.

Untrue.

J

On Tue, 5 Jun 2007 09:04:37 -0400, in alt.internet.wireless , "Larry
\(The Other Larry\)" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:

>While it does get old, it' not as boring as our resident
>Anti-Top-Poster/Grammer Policemen can be.

Well some of us disagree since top posting and bad grammar make for
incoherent posts, whereas JN's posts are just a bit repetitive. I for
one would prefer him to post a weekly "welcome to AIW" message with
links to FAQs and the Wiki, but there it is. I can live with it.
--
Mark McIntyre

In article <466494ac$0$11263$(E-Mail Removed)>,
Warren Oates <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:

>Have you heard of "filtering?" Mr. Navas posts that stuff for useful
>reasons, if you don't like it, don't fucking read it.

Useful? ROFLMFAO!

News wrote:
> Tired of 'all.navas.all.the.time' ?
>
> Then insist it stop.

Most people simply kill-file him and are done with it. You can't do
anything about it. There are people like him in every news group.

In fact, the people complaining, and worse, those responding to posts
from people like Navas, simply compound the problem because it requires
even more kill-filing to get rid of the follow-ups.