Devs wrote:
> In message <(E-Mail Removed)>, rainandsnow
> <(E-Mail Removed)> writes
>> The one I have is, apparently a "Broadband router access point". It
>> has a facility to enable wireless bridging and also to enable WDS
>> Dedicated Mode.
>
> Do you have a link to the specs? It's just that the kit I have used that
> uses WDS (D-Link) appears to do it differently. I can't see that using a
> second router would work unless all of its routey bit were turned off in
> WDS dedicated mode.
The support page is here:
http://www.buffalotech.com/support/downloads/
They seem to be listed by type rather than by model number which makes
comparisons difficult.
I can't find a download for the router I've got, however the more recent
ones or at least some of them seem to have a physical switch to switch
between router mode and AP mode. Mine doesn't, it has WDS and WDS
dedicated mode in the menu.
>>
>> I don't see any problem with the antenna - if I stick a 9db one I
>> already have out the window, I can pick it up with a laptop at the
>> remote location, so was thinking that something acting as a repeater
>> there coupled with a similar antenna should be OK.
>
> yes this will work with omni directional aerials provided the signal you
> get _is_ definitely strong enough at the remote location.
>>
>> You say I might need 2 APs at the far end - I don't understand . . .
>> Am I wrong in assuming that WDS mode means the Buffalo will be acting
>> as a bridge and also doing the redistribution??
>
> WDS + AP mode provides this functionality. Don't know about WDS as
> applied to this particular Buffalo kit. The point I was trying to make
> is that, to get a reliable signal over that kind of distance a
> directional antenna has to be used. Using a directional antenna to
> redistribute the signal doesn't work - it just beams it back where it
> has come from! Connecting to a 2nd AP cures this but slows things down
> for the end users.
>>
>> My reason for wanting to stick with Buffalo is that the router/AP I
>> have is rated at 125 Mbps - but only with other Buffalos IIRC. I know
>> I won't achieve that speed, but was hoping to get twice what I'd get
>> with a non Buffalo product.
>
> Ah. Multi channel hogging proprietary psuedo standards. If you want
> reliability stick with the current standards i.e 802.11g.
Oh dear. I didn't know that.