The War on Wi Fi

http://fe35.news.re3.yahoo.com/blogs/null/25598

The War on Wi-Fi
http://fe35.news.re3.yahoo.com/blogs/null/25598

Back in February I sat in the Attlee room in Westminster and heard Dr
George Carlo explain the scientific mechanism by which cells and DNA are
damaged by radiation from mobile phones, masts and Wi-Fi. Dr Carlo isn't
just some conspiracy theorist. He ran the US cell phone companies' own
health research program during the 1990's and is at the cutting edge of
research in this area. He backed up his talk with several studies and was
able to site research that government scientists weren't even yet aware of.

"Lenny" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:f12lk4$r2v$(E-Mail Removed)
> http://fe35.news.re3.yahoo.com/blogs/null/25598
>
> The War on Wi-Fi
> http://fe35.news.re3.yahoo.com/blogs/null/25598
>
> Back in February I sat in the Attlee room in Westminster

Whoopee, good for you.

Yawn..............


Ivor

>"..able to site research "
i'd have thought someone with a massive brain, such as yourself, would know
the word is cite, not site.
Unless, of course, he was able to site the research by placing it in the
bin?

On Sun, 29 Apr 2007 18:45:39 +0100, Lenny <(E-Mail Removed)>
wrote:

>http://fe35.news.re3.yahoo.com/blogs/null/25598
>
>The War on Wi-Fi
>http://fe35.news.re3.yahoo.com/blogs/null/25598
>
>Back in February I sat in the Attlee room in Westminster and heard Dr
>George Carlo explain the scientific mechanism by which cells and DNA are
>damaged by radiation from mobile phones, masts and Wi-Fi. Dr Carlo isn't
>just some conspiracy theorist. He ran the US cell phone companies' own
>health research program during the 1990's and is at the cutting edge of
>research in this area. He backed up his talk with several studies and was
>able to site research that government scientists weren't even yet aware of.
>
>
Did he use the word "radiation" or the term non-ionising radiation"?

If it was the former then he was being somewhat les than accurate and
a tad sensational, if the latter, you are being somewhat less than
accurate and a tad sensational.
--
Cheers

Peter

Please remove the invalid to reply