| Home | Register | Members | Search | Links |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
| |
|
Anthony
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Christopher,
Are your users Local Administrators? Anthony http://www.airdesk.co.uk "Christopher A. Newell" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message news:un2g$Q8%(E-Mail Removed)... >I posted on this a couple of weeks ago and then the problem "appeared" to >clear up for a while. > > This appeared to be a very sporadic problem, but as I look more closely it > seems to be more prevalent than I had imagined. > > I have a medium-small, but moderatly complex network configured in 7 > logical segments, each operating on it's own IP subnet. In three of the > segments, dynamically addressed PCs are transiently loosing their DNS > entries, multiple local DNS servers being replaced by 168.95.1.1, an > operating DNS server in Taiwan. (in fact the only service answering on > about half of the 168.95.1.x subnet is DNS) The loss of the correct DNS > entrires disrupts the client's network connectivity until the > configuration is restored (all Internet access for user PCs is through a > proxy server, our firewall prevents any client address from communicating > with the Internet in any other way, so the affected PC gets no response at > all.) "ipconfig /renew" seems to correct the problem, as does re-strating > the PC. > > As a temporary workaround, I have assigned the outside IP to one of my > internal DNS servers and routed all requests for that IP to the correct > LAN address. This is preserving my users' connectivity but is eliminating > thier calls for help to notify me. > > After implementing the temporary solution, I have been monitoring detailed > traffic on the DNS server, only to find that inquiries using the off-site > IP are almost constant. It seems like there is one PC, occasionally two, > using that IP for DNS (and SMB and a few other protocols) just about all > the time, although the issue seems to move from computer to computer at no > identifiable interval. Apparently, either some of the users are > experiencing problems and just re-starting or the DNS error is not lasting > long enough to cause them to actually see the connectivity loss. > > These PCs are in three different network segments, broken up at Layer 3, > configured by three different DHCP servers (although all are in the same > AD forrest.) Before I identified the problem being present in three > different segments, I tried stopping the known DHCP server and trying to > obtain address information - No rogue DHCP apparent. We are using 128 WEP > on a small number of wireless APs, but I have ruled out a customer > notebook with an ICS configuration running. > > I have run throuough Spyware and AV scanns of some of the affected PCs > with no notable results (CA-ITM and Spybot S&D). Staticly addressed PCs > are not affected and one IP subnet that is dynamically addressed but > operates in an independent AD domain also seems to be OK. > > Has anybody else ever seen anything remotely like this ? > > Any ideas what I can look at to figure out where a changing DNS IP could > be getting injected into the system, across routers? > > I think that I would have gotten an incorrect IP configuration if I had a > hardware based DHCP on the LAN (like a SOHO router), but it may bear > noting that a search on that IP reveals it to be one of the most commonly > referenced publicly accessable DNS servers. The IP appears in many pieces > of hardware documentation (again, like SOHO gateways). > |
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
SQLDAWG
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Chris a couple of questions;
7 Subnets, is there any routers connecting these subnets? How many DHCP server on the Network? How amny Dns Servers? secondary and primary? i will get to the internet access!!! "Christopher A. Newell" wrote: > I posted on this a couple of weeks ago and then the problem "appeared" to > clear up for a while. > > This appeared to be a very sporadic problem, but as I look more closely it > seems to be more prevalent than I had imagined. > > I have a medium-small, but moderatly complex network configured in 7 logical > segments, each operating on it's own IP subnet. In three of the segments, > dynamically addressed PCs are transiently loosing their DNS entries, > multiple local DNS servers being replaced by 168.95.1.1, an operating DNS > server in Taiwan. (in fact the only service answering on about half of the > 168.95.1.x subnet is DNS) The loss of the correct DNS entrires disrupts the > client's network connectivity until the configuration is restored (all > Internet access for user PCs is through a proxy server, our firewall > prevents any client address from communicating with the Internet in any > other way, so the affected PC gets no response at all.) "ipconfig /renew" > seems to correct the problem, as does re-strating the PC. > > As a temporary workaround, I have assigned the outside IP to one of my > internal DNS servers and routed all requests for that IP to the correct LAN > address. This is preserving my users' connectivity but is eliminating thier > calls for help to notify me. > > After implementing the temporary solution, I have been monitoring detailed > traffic on the DNS server, only to find that inquiries using the off-site IP > are almost constant. It seems like there is one PC, occasionally two, using > that IP for DNS (and SMB and a few other protocols) just about all the time, > although the issue seems to move from computer to computer at no > identifiable interval. Apparently, either some of the users are > experiencing problems and just re-starting or the DNS error is not lasting > long enough to cause them to actually see the connectivity loss. > > These PCs are in three different network segments, broken up at Layer 3, > configured by three different DHCP servers (although all are in the same AD > forrest.) Before I identified the problem being present in three different > segments, I tried stopping the known DHCP server and trying to obtain > address information - No rogue DHCP apparent. We are using 128 WEP on a > small number of wireless APs, but I have ruled out a customer notebook with > an ICS configuration running. > > I have run throuough Spyware and AV scanns of some of the affected PCs with > no notable results (CA-ITM and Spybot S&D). Staticly addressed PCs are not > affected and one IP subnet that is dynamically addressed but operates in an > independent AD domain also seems to be OK. > > Has anybody else ever seen anything remotely like this ? > > Any ideas what I can look at to figure out where a changing DNS IP could be > getting injected into the system, across routers? > > I think that I would have gotten an incorrect IP configuration if I had a > hardware based DHCP on the LAN (like a SOHO router), but it may bear noting > that a search on that IP reveals it to be one of the most commonly > referenced publicly accessable DNS servers. The IP appears in many pieces > of hardware documentation (again, like SOHO gateways). > > > |
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
Christopher A. Newell
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Some are. Most are "Power Users" on thier PCs.
It is just after close of business so most of the systems are off-line right now, but I don't believe that there is actually a correlation between these issues. If anything, with one exception, I think that most of the PCs where I am seeing the foreign DNS entry are being used by local non-Adminsitrators when the problem is occuring. "Anthony" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message news:egK65a8%(E-Mail Removed)... > Christopher, > Are your users Local Administrators? > Anthony > http://www.airdesk.co.uk > > > "Christopher A. Newell" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message > news:un2g$Q8%(E-Mail Removed)... >>I posted on this a couple of weeks ago and then the problem "appeared" to >>clear up for a while. >> >> This appeared to be a very sporadic problem, but as I look more closely >> it seems to be more prevalent than I had imagined. >> >> I have a medium-small, but moderatly complex network configured in 7 >> logical segments, each operating on it's own IP subnet. In three of the >> segments, dynamically addressed PCs are transiently loosing their DNS >> entries, multiple local DNS servers being replaced by 168.95.1.1, an >> operating DNS server in Taiwan. (in fact the only service answering on >> about half of the 168.95.1.x subnet is DNS) The loss of the correct DNS >> entrires disrupts the client's network connectivity until the >> configuration is restored (all Internet access for user PCs is through a >> proxy server, our firewall prevents any client address from communicating >> with the Internet in any other way, so the affected PC gets no response >> at all.) "ipconfig /renew" seems to correct the problem, as does >> re-strating the PC. >> >> As a temporary workaround, I have assigned the outside IP to one of my >> internal DNS servers and routed all requests for that IP to the correct >> LAN address. This is preserving my users' connectivity but is >> eliminating thier calls for help to notify me. >> >> After implementing the temporary solution, I have been monitoring >> detailed traffic on the DNS server, only to find that inquiries using the >> off-site IP are almost constant. It seems like there is one PC, >> occasionally two, using that IP for DNS (and SMB and a few other >> protocols) just about all the time, although the issue seems to move from >> computer to computer at no identifiable interval. Apparently, either >> some of the users are experiencing problems and just re-starting or the >> DNS error is not lasting long enough to cause them to actually see the >> connectivity loss. >> >> These PCs are in three different network segments, broken up at Layer 3, >> configured by three different DHCP servers (although all are in the same >> AD forrest.) Before I identified the problem being present in three >> different segments, I tried stopping the known DHCP server and trying to >> obtain address information - No rogue DHCP apparent. We are using 128 >> WEP on a small number of wireless APs, but I have ruled out a customer >> notebook with an ICS configuration running. >> >> I have run throuough Spyware and AV scanns of some of the affected PCs >> with no notable results (CA-ITM and Spybot S&D). Staticly addressed PCs >> are not affected and one IP subnet that is dynamically addressed but >> operates in an independent AD domain also seems to be OK. >> >> Has anybody else ever seen anything remotely like this ? >> >> Any ideas what I can look at to figure out where a changing DNS IP could >> be getting injected into the system, across routers? >> >> I think that I would have gotten an incorrect IP configuration if I had a >> hardware based DHCP on the LAN (like a SOHO router), but it may bear >> noting that a search on that IP reveals it to be one of the most commonly >> referenced publicly accessable DNS servers. The IP appears in many >> pieces of hardware documentation (again, like SOHO gateways). >> > > |
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
SQLDAWG
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Ok Chris!!!!
Routers involve: DHCP relay agents. Dns servers in different location regular sync shoudl take place. Host A records checking should be done by the Dns server. Secure Dynamic updates only work Xp machines. Check the events on your Dhcp server!!! Check the events on your Dns server Check the events on AD.....thats havoc when your Dns dont work properly because AD is fully dependent on your Dns....replication just to mension. My opinion this is a DHCP issue because DHCP is responsible for the DNS distribution....RELAY AGENTS VERY IMPORTANT THIS IS ON SERVER 2003? SQLDAWG PTA RSA 2010 soccer/wcup "Christopher A. Newell" wrote: > I posted on this a couple of weeks ago and then the problem "appeared" to > clear up for a while. > > This appeared to be a very sporadic problem, but as I look more closely it > seems to be more prevalent than I had imagined. > > I have a medium-small, but moderatly complex network configured in 7 logical > segments, each operating on it's own IP subnet. In three of the segments, > dynamically addressed PCs are transiently loosing their DNS entries, > multiple local DNS servers being replaced by 168.95.1.1, an operating DNS > server in Taiwan. (in fact the only service answering on about half of the > 168.95.1.x subnet is DNS) The loss of the correct DNS entrires disrupts the > client's network connectivity until the configuration is restored (all > Internet access for user PCs is through a proxy server, our firewall > prevents any client address from communicating with the Internet in any > other way, so the affected PC gets no response at all.) "ipconfig /renew" > seems to correct the problem, as does re-strating the PC. > > As a temporary workaround, I have assigned the outside IP to one of my > internal DNS servers and routed all requests for that IP to the correct LAN > address. This is preserving my users' connectivity but is eliminating thier > calls for help to notify me. > > After implementing the temporary solution, I have been monitoring detailed > traffic on the DNS server, only to find that inquiries using the off-site IP > are almost constant. It seems like there is one PC, occasionally two, using > that IP for DNS (and SMB and a few other protocols) just about all the time, > although the issue seems to move from computer to computer at no > identifiable interval. Apparently, either some of the users are > experiencing problems and just re-starting or the DNS error is not lasting > long enough to cause them to actually see the connectivity loss. > > These PCs are in three different network segments, broken up at Layer 3, > configured by three different DHCP servers (although all are in the same AD > forrest.) Before I identified the problem being present in three different > segments, I tried stopping the known DHCP server and trying to obtain > address information - No rogue DHCP apparent. We are using 128 WEP on a > small number of wireless APs, but I have ruled out a customer notebook with > an ICS configuration running. > > I have run throuough Spyware and AV scanns of some of the affected PCs with > no notable results (CA-ITM and Spybot S&D). Staticly addressed PCs are not > affected and one IP subnet that is dynamically addressed but operates in an > independent AD domain also seems to be OK. > > Has anybody else ever seen anything remotely like this ? > > Any ideas what I can look at to figure out where a changing DNS IP could be > getting injected into the system, across routers? > > I think that I would have gotten an incorrect IP configuration if I had a > hardware based DHCP on the LAN (like a SOHO router), but it may bear noting > that a search on that IP reveals it to be one of the most commonly > referenced publicly accessable DNS servers. The IP appears in many pieces > of hardware documentation (again, like SOHO gateways). > > > |
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
Anthony
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
If you set up a PC where the user is not a Local Admin, or a Power user,
does it change in this way? Anthony, http://www.airdesk.com "Christopher A. Newell" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message news:OA$jAz8%(E-Mail Removed)... > Some are. Most are "Power Users" on thier PCs. > > It is just after close of business so most of the systems are off-line > right now, but I don't believe that there is actually a correlation > between these issues. If anything, with one exception, I think that most > of the PCs where I am seeing the foreign DNS entry are being used by local > non-Adminsitrators when the problem is occuring. > > "Anthony" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message > news:egK65a8%(E-Mail Removed)... >> Christopher, >> Are your users Local Administrators? >> Anthony >> http://www.airdesk.co.uk >> >> >> "Christopher A. Newell" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message >> news:un2g$Q8%(E-Mail Removed)... >>>I posted on this a couple of weeks ago and then the problem "appeared" to >>>clear up for a while. >>> >>> This appeared to be a very sporadic problem, but as I look more closely >>> it seems to be more prevalent than I had imagined. >>> >>> I have a medium-small, but moderatly complex network configured in 7 >>> logical segments, each operating on it's own IP subnet. In three of the >>> segments, dynamically addressed PCs are transiently loosing their DNS >>> entries, multiple local DNS servers being replaced by 168.95.1.1, an >>> operating DNS server in Taiwan. (in fact the only service answering on >>> about half of the 168.95.1.x subnet is DNS) The loss of the correct DNS >>> entrires disrupts the client's network connectivity until the >>> configuration is restored (all Internet access for user PCs is through a >>> proxy server, our firewall prevents any client address from >>> communicating with the Internet in any other way, so the affected PC >>> gets no response at all.) "ipconfig /renew" seems to correct the >>> problem, as does re-strating the PC. >>> >>> As a temporary workaround, I have assigned the outside IP to one of my >>> internal DNS servers and routed all requests for that IP to the correct >>> LAN address. This is preserving my users' connectivity but is >>> eliminating thier calls for help to notify me. >>> >>> After implementing the temporary solution, I have been monitoring >>> detailed traffic on the DNS server, only to find that inquiries using >>> the off-site IP are almost constant. It seems like there is one PC, >>> occasionally two, using that IP for DNS (and SMB and a few other >>> protocols) just about all the time, although the issue seems to move >>> from computer to computer at no identifiable interval. Apparently, >>> either some of the users are experiencing problems and just re-starting >>> or the DNS error is not lasting long enough to cause them to actually >>> see the connectivity loss. >>> >>> These PCs are in three different network segments, broken up at Layer 3, >>> configured by three different DHCP servers (although all are in the same >>> AD forrest.) Before I identified the problem being present in three >>> different segments, I tried stopping the known DHCP server and trying to >>> obtain address information - No rogue DHCP apparent. We are using 128 >>> WEP on a small number of wireless APs, but I have ruled out a customer >>> notebook with an ICS configuration running. >>> >>> I have run throuough Spyware and AV scanns of some of the affected PCs >>> with no notable results (CA-ITM and Spybot S&D). Staticly addressed PCs >>> are not affected and one IP subnet that is dynamically addressed but >>> operates in an independent AD domain also seems to be OK. >>> >>> Has anybody else ever seen anything remotely like this ? >>> >>> Any ideas what I can look at to figure out where a changing DNS IP could >>> be getting injected into the system, across routers? >>> >>> I think that I would have gotten an incorrect IP configuration if I had >>> a hardware based DHCP on the LAN (like a SOHO router), but it may bear >>> noting that a search on that IP reveals it to be one of the most >>> commonly referenced publicly accessable DNS servers. The IP appears in >>> many pieces of hardware documentation (again, like SOHO gateways). >>> >> >> > > |
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
Christopher A. Newell
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
The 7 subnets are physically separated by routers.
Two are totally static configurations. There are 5 DHCP servers, one physically located on each subnet. Of the four (sorry, missed one) subnets that are experiencing this, one is a core, and the other three are branched in a distributed star. The server that is primary for the users in each of the three branch networks runs DHCP, has a network conenction to the core, and provides the routing. The DHCP is bound only to the NIC on the remote side of the "distributed star". (The 5th DHCP is also an IP router to the core, but it is a controller for a trusted domain.) I am going to have to confirm, but I do not believe that any relay agents are in operation. There are three DNS servers running. One provides external lookup and carried the primary site for our externally addressable sites, all three resolve our inside *.local DNS entries. I don't think that this is actually a DNS problem, except to the extent that when a client PC changes the DNS server entries to the "foreign" server the client cannot resolve internal names (and since they are blocked from direct outside access, they can't contact the outside server to resolve public names either They just loose all connectivity for any application that is DNS name dependent.) "SQLDAWG" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message news:F46EC77F-9D09-4334-B847-(E-Mail Removed)... > Chris a couple of questions; > 7 Subnets, is there any routers connecting these subnets? > How many DHCP server on the Network? > How amny Dns Servers? secondary and primary? > > i will get to the internet access!!! > > > > > "Christopher A. Newell" wrote: > >> I posted on this a couple of weeks ago and then the problem "appeared" to >> clear up for a while. >> >> This appeared to be a very sporadic problem, but as I look more closely >> it >> seems to be more prevalent than I had imagined. >> >> I have a medium-small, but moderatly complex network configured in 7 >> logical >> segments, each operating on it's own IP subnet. In three of the >> segments, >> dynamically addressed PCs are transiently loosing their DNS entries, >> multiple local DNS servers being replaced by 168.95.1.1, an operating DNS >> server in Taiwan. (in fact the only service answering on about half of >> the >> 168.95.1.x subnet is DNS) The loss of the correct DNS entrires disrupts >> the >> client's network connectivity until the configuration is restored (all >> Internet access for user PCs is through a proxy server, our firewall >> prevents any client address from communicating with the Internet in any >> other way, so the affected PC gets no response at all.) "ipconfig >> /renew" >> seems to correct the problem, as does re-strating the PC. >> >> As a temporary workaround, I have assigned the outside IP to one of my >> internal DNS servers and routed all requests for that IP to the correct >> LAN >> address. This is preserving my users' connectivity but is eliminating >> thier >> calls for help to notify me. >> >> After implementing the temporary solution, I have been monitoring >> detailed >> traffic on the DNS server, only to find that inquiries using the off-site >> IP >> are almost constant. It seems like there is one PC, occasionally two, >> using >> that IP for DNS (and SMB and a few other protocols) just about all the >> time, >> although the issue seems to move from computer to computer at no >> identifiable interval. Apparently, either some of the users are >> experiencing problems and just re-starting or the DNS error is not >> lasting >> long enough to cause them to actually see the connectivity loss. >> >> These PCs are in three different network segments, broken up at Layer 3, >> configured by three different DHCP servers (although all are in the same >> AD >> forrest.) Before I identified the problem being present in three >> different >> segments, I tried stopping the known DHCP server and trying to obtain >> address information - No rogue DHCP apparent. We are using 128 WEP on a >> small number of wireless APs, but I have ruled out a customer notebook >> with >> an ICS configuration running. >> >> I have run throuough Spyware and AV scanns of some of the affected PCs >> with >> no notable results (CA-ITM and Spybot S&D). Staticly addressed PCs are >> not >> affected and one IP subnet that is dynamically addressed but operates in >> an >> independent AD domain also seems to be OK. >> >> Has anybody else ever seen anything remotely like this ? >> >> Any ideas what I can look at to figure out where a changing DNS IP could >> be >> getting injected into the system, across routers? >> >> I think that I would have gotten an incorrect IP configuration if I had a >> hardware based DHCP on the LAN (like a SOHO router), but it may bear >> noting >> that a search on that IP reveals it to be one of the most commonly >> referenced publicly accessable DNS servers. The IP appears in many >> pieces >> of hardware documentation (again, like SOHO gateways). >> >> >> |
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
Christopher A. Newell
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
I'm going to have to try this. We are off-hours now and I am not seeing any
traffic to the foreign IP. Whatever device(s) are involved or causing the issue are logged out/powered off. "Anthony" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message news:%23Ajw698%(E-Mail Removed)... > If you set up a PC where the user is not a Local Admin, or a Power user, > does it change in this way? > Anthony, > http://www.airdesk.com > > > "Christopher A. Newell" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message > news:OA$jAz8%(E-Mail Removed)... >> Some are. Most are "Power Users" on thier PCs. >> >> It is just after close of business so most of the systems are off-line >> right now, but I don't believe that there is actually a correlation >> between these issues. If anything, with one exception, I think that most >> of the PCs where I am seeing the foreign DNS entry are being used by >> local non-Adminsitrators when the problem is occuring. >> >> "Anthony" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message >> news:egK65a8%(E-Mail Removed)... >>> Christopher, >>> Are your users Local Administrators? >>> Anthony >>> http://www.airdesk.co.uk >>> >>> >>> "Christopher A. Newell" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message >>> news:un2g$Q8%(E-Mail Removed)... >>>>I posted on this a couple of weeks ago and then the problem "appeared" >>>>to clear up for a while. >>>> >>>> This appeared to be a very sporadic problem, but as I look more closely >>>> it seems to be more prevalent than I had imagined. >>>> >>>> I have a medium-small, but moderatly complex network configured in 7 >>>> logical segments, each operating on it's own IP subnet. In three of >>>> the segments, dynamically addressed PCs are transiently loosing their >>>> DNS entries, multiple local DNS servers being replaced by 168.95.1.1, >>>> an operating DNS server in Taiwan. (in fact the only service answering >>>> on about half of the 168.95.1.x subnet is DNS) The loss of the correct >>>> DNS entrires disrupts the client's network connectivity until the >>>> configuration is restored (all Internet access for user PCs is through >>>> a proxy server, our firewall prevents any client address from >>>> communicating with the Internet in any other way, so the affected PC >>>> gets no response at all.) "ipconfig /renew" seems to correct the >>>> problem, as does re-strating the PC. >>>> >>>> As a temporary workaround, I have assigned the outside IP to one of my >>>> internal DNS servers and routed all requests for that IP to the correct >>>> LAN address. This is preserving my users' connectivity but is >>>> eliminating thier calls for help to notify me. >>>> >>>> After implementing the temporary solution, I have been monitoring >>>> detailed traffic on the DNS server, only to find that inquiries using >>>> the off-site IP are almost constant. It seems like there is one PC, >>>> occasionally two, using that IP for DNS (and SMB and a few other >>>> protocols) just about all the time, although the issue seems to move >>>> from computer to computer at no identifiable interval. Apparently, >>>> either some of the users are experiencing problems and just re-starting >>>> or the DNS error is not lasting long enough to cause them to actually >>>> see the connectivity loss. >>>> >>>> These PCs are in three different network segments, broken up at Layer >>>> 3, configured by three different DHCP servers (although all are in the >>>> same AD forrest.) Before I identified the problem being present in >>>> three different segments, I tried stopping the known DHCP server and >>>> trying to obtain address information - No rogue DHCP apparent. We are >>>> using 128 WEP on a small number of wireless APs, but I have ruled out a >>>> customer notebook with an ICS configuration running. >>>> >>>> I have run throuough Spyware and AV scanns of some of the affected PCs >>>> with no notable results (CA-ITM and Spybot S&D). Staticly addressed >>>> PCs are not affected and one IP subnet that is dynamically addressed >>>> but operates in an independent AD domain also seems to be OK. >>>> >>>> Has anybody else ever seen anything remotely like this ? >>>> >>>> Any ideas what I can look at to figure out where a changing DNS IP >>>> could be getting injected into the system, across routers? >>>> >>>> I think that I would have gotten an incorrect IP configuration if I had >>>> a hardware based DHCP on the LAN (like a SOHO router), but it may bear >>>> noting that a search on that IP reveals it to be one of the most >>>> commonly referenced publicly accessable DNS servers. The IP appears in >>>> many pieces of hardware documentation (again, like SOHO gateways). >>>> >>> >>> >> >> > > |
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
Roger Abell [MVP]
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Christopher,
I read your posting. May it be correctly restated as: Some, but not all, client machines that are DHCP clients are loosing their configured DNS servers, with these always being replaced by 168.95.1.1. Further, only the DHCP clients in three of the network segments that are part of one AD forest are affected (i.e. DHCP clients in other segments and/or forest are not affected in this way). There are no rogue DHCP servers on the network segments. Your statement that renewing the DHCP lease reestablishes correct DNS server IPs lets us know that you are using DHCP scope delivered nameserver IPs. Your statement that restarting the machines also reestablishes indicates that there are no GPO delivered incorrect DNS server IPs. Since only an account with admin authority can set the DNS servers in the TCP/IP config, we know this must be happening due to something running with system/admin context on the machines where this happens. So, you need to find that admin/system process on or remotely accessing those machines. This is not happening willy-nilly. I am leaning toward a steathed malware. Have you probed the 168.95.1.1 DNS server to see if it is hosting a mock zone(s) in which your client machines might access trusted hosts ? (i.e. is this part of a man in the middle effort ?). -- Roger "Christopher A. Newell" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message news:un2g$Q8%(E-Mail Removed)... >I posted on this a couple of weeks ago and then the problem "appeared" to >clear up for a while. > > This appeared to be a very sporadic problem, but as I look more closely it > seems to be more prevalent than I had imagined. > > I have a medium-small, but moderatly complex network configured in 7 > logical segments, each operating on it's own IP subnet. In three of the > segments, dynamically addressed PCs are transiently loosing their DNS > entries, multiple local DNS servers being replaced by 168.95.1.1, an > operating DNS server in Taiwan. (in fact the only service answering on > about half of the 168.95.1.x subnet is DNS) The loss of the correct DNS > entrires disrupts the client's network connectivity until the > configuration is restored (all Internet access for user PCs is through a > proxy server, our firewall prevents any client address from communicating > with the Internet in any other way, so the affected PC gets no response at > all.) "ipconfig /renew" seems to correct the problem, as does re-strating > the PC. > > As a temporary workaround, I have assigned the outside IP to one of my > internal DNS servers and routed all requests for that IP to the correct > LAN address. This is preserving my users' connectivity but is eliminating > thier calls for help to notify me. > > After implementing the temporary solution, I have been monitoring detailed > traffic on the DNS server, only to find that inquiries using the off-site > IP are almost constant. It seems like there is one PC, occasionally two, > using that IP for DNS (and SMB and a few other protocols) just about all > the time, although the issue seems to move from computer to computer at no > identifiable interval. Apparently, either some of the users are > experiencing problems and just re-starting or the DNS error is not lasting > long enough to cause them to actually see the connectivity loss. > > These PCs are in three different network segments, broken up at Layer 3, > configured by three different DHCP servers (although all are in the same > AD forrest.) Before I identified the problem being present in three > different segments, I tried stopping the known DHCP server and trying to > obtain address information - No rogue DHCP apparent. We are using 128 WEP > on a small number of wireless APs, but I have ruled out a customer > notebook with an ICS configuration running. > > I have run throuough Spyware and AV scanns of some of the affected PCs > with no notable results (CA-ITM and Spybot S&D). Staticly addressed PCs > are not affected and one IP subnet that is dynamically addressed but > operates in an independent AD domain also seems to be OK. > > Has anybody else ever seen anything remotely like this ? > > Any ideas what I can look at to figure out where a changing DNS IP could > be getting injected into the system, across routers? > > I think that I would have gotten an incorrect IP configuration if I had a > hardware based DHCP on the LAN (like a SOHO router), but it may bear > noting that a search on that IP reveals it to be one of the most commonly > referenced publicly accessable DNS servers. The IP appears in many pieces > of hardware documentation (again, like SOHO gateways). > |
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
Christopher A. Newell
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
The only thing that is actually incorrect (my error in the original post) is
that there are 4 LAN segments affected. One is essentially my "core" which includes our Internet and two other private WAN connections, as well as servers that are equally utilized among our departments. The other 6 segments are departmentaly orgnaized and users are grouped with server resources that they use most frequently. Of the three unaffected segments, one is DHCP but is part of a trusted domain in a separate AD forrest, One is static addressed and is in a child domain, one is static addressed and validates in an external domain over a WAN connection. The general topology is distributed-star with each branch LAN segment being routed through one of thier servers to the core segment to reach the Internet, WANs, and (occasionally) other branch LANs. In the three branch LAN segments, the DHCP server is on the same system as the routing function, bound to the NIC serving the branch LAN (if it was propogating to the core, I would have gotten a configuration with the core's DHCP server stopped.) Running a sniffer on my core router's traffic and filtering on the foreign DNS IP, I am only seeing traffic from one or two clients at any one time, but even though no one client seems to be affected for a long period I am now seeing traffic from some host almost constantly during business hours. I have probed the foreign DNS on several common domains (microsoft.com, google.com, etc.) and do not see any inconsistencies with known accurate responses, but this has not been an exhaustive check. I will take a closer look at the DNS queries being directed to that host during the day Friday and look more closely at that. Although we appear to be well scanned internally, I tend to agree with the malware assessment. What I cannot determine yet is if it is running directly on the affected machines or if it is something that is being injected externally. The fact that this is crossing Layer 3 boundaries leads me to suspect client, but the migratory nature (with only a small number of machines affected at any one time) leaves a suspicion of a single infected host affecting the other clients. "Roger Abell [MVP]" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message news:%23MKuNr%23%(E-Mail Removed).. . > Christopher, > > I read your posting. May it be correctly restated as: > > Some, but not all, client machines that are DHCP clients > are loosing their configured DNS servers, with these always > being replaced by 168.95.1.1. Further, only the DHCP clients > in three of the network segments that are part of one AD forest > are affected (i.e. DHCP clients in other segments and/or forest > are not affected in this way). There are no rogue DHCP servers > on the network segments. > > Your statement that renewing the DHCP lease reestablishes > correct DNS server IPs lets us know that you are using DHCP > scope delivered nameserver IPs. Your statement that restarting > the machines also reestablishes indicates that there are no GPO > delivered incorrect DNS server IPs. > > Since only an account with admin authority can set the DNS > servers in the TCP/IP config, we know this must be happening > due to something running with system/admin context on the > machines where this happens. > So, you need to find that admin/system process on or remotely > accessing those machines. This is not happening willy-nilly. > > I am leaning toward a steathed malware. > > Have you probed the 168.95.1.1 DNS server to see if it is > hosting a mock zone(s) in which your client machines might > access trusted hosts ? (i.e. is this part of a man in the middle > effort ?). > > -- > Roger > > "Christopher A. Newell" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message > news:un2g$Q8%(E-Mail Removed)... >>I posted on this a couple of weeks ago and then the problem "appeared" to >>clear up for a while. >> >> This appeared to be a very sporadic problem, but as I look more closely >> it seems to be more prevalent than I had imagined. >> >> I have a medium-small, but moderatly complex network configured in 7 >> logical segments, each operating on it's own IP subnet. In three of the >> segments, dynamically addressed PCs are transiently loosing their DNS >> entries, multiple local DNS servers being replaced by 168.95.1.1, an >> operating DNS server in Taiwan. (in fact the only service answering on >> about half of the 168.95.1.x subnet is DNS) The loss of the correct DNS >> entrires disrupts the client's network connectivity until the >> configuration is restored (all Internet access for user PCs is through a >> proxy server, our firewall prevents any client address from communicating >> with the Internet in any other way, so the affected PC gets no response >> at all.) "ipconfig /renew" seems to correct the problem, as does >> re-strating the PC. >> >> As a temporary workaround, I have assigned the outside IP to one of my >> internal DNS servers and routed all requests for that IP to the correct >> LAN address. This is preserving my users' connectivity but is >> eliminating thier calls for help to notify me. >> >> After implementing the temporary solution, I have been monitoring >> detailed traffic on the DNS server, only to find that inquiries using the >> off-site IP are almost constant. It seems like there is one PC, >> occasionally two, using that IP for DNS (and SMB and a few other >> protocols) just about all the time, although the issue seems to move from >> computer to computer at no identifiable interval. Apparently, either >> some of the users are experiencing problems and just re-starting or the >> DNS error is not lasting long enough to cause them to actually see the >> connectivity loss. >> >> These PCs are in three different network segments, broken up at Layer 3, >> configured by three different DHCP servers (although all are in the same >> AD forrest.) Before I identified the problem being present in three >> different segments, I tried stopping the known DHCP server and trying to >> obtain address information - No rogue DHCP apparent. We are using 128 >> WEP on a small number of wireless APs, but I have ruled out a customer >> notebook with an ICS configuration running. >> >> I have run throuough Spyware and AV scanns of some of the affected PCs >> with no notable results (CA-ITM and Spybot S&D). Staticly addressed PCs >> are not affected and one IP subnet that is dynamically addressed but >> operates in an independent AD domain also seems to be OK. >> >> Has anybody else ever seen anything remotely like this ? >> >> Any ideas what I can look at to figure out where a changing DNS IP could >> be getting injected into the system, across routers? >> >> I think that I would have gotten an incorrect IP configuration if I had a >> hardware based DHCP on the LAN (like a SOHO router), but it may bear >> noting that a search on that IP reveals it to be one of the most commonly >> referenced publicly accessable DNS servers. The IP appears in many >> pieces of hardware documentation (again, like SOHO gateways). >> > > |
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
|
|
| |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| DNS entry | mummy_bear67 | Wireless Networks | 1 | 01-08-2010 10:13 PM |
| Regarding MX Entry | musammil | Linux Networking | 1 | 12-19-2008 07:27 AM |
| Can't stop my wireless from wandering to other networks. | Cartman | Wireless Internet | 4 | 07-10-2007 04:06 PM |
| What's This Log Entry Mean? | Dan N | Linux Networking | 4 | 02-02-2006 05:01 AM |
| How do I fix the Reverse DNS entry(ies)? | Bill | Windows Networking | 1 | 11-04-2005 04:30 PM |
Forum Software Powered by vBulletin®, Copyright Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.3.2 ©2009, Crawlability, Inc. |



Linear Mode

