On Wed, 07 Jan 2004 00:21:38 GMT, V W Wall <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
>daytripper wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, 06 Jan 2004 06:12:05 GMT, V W Wall <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
>>
>> >daytripper wrote:
>> >>
>> >> On Tue, 06 Jan 2004 01:34:35 GMT, H Brett Bolen <(E-Mail Removed)>
>> >> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> >My motherboard ( supermicro x5dal-g) has wake on lan which normally
>> >> >works fine.
>> >> >
>> >> >However if power is removed ( ie I shutdown normally, unplug
>> >> >it, then plug it back in ), the machine does not wake up.
>> >> >
>> >> >Has anybody had a problem with this ( or got it to work)?
>> >> >
>> >> >I suspect that it is not a problem with other adaptors.
>> >>
>> >> Nobody with a properly designed motherboard will get the above scenario to
>> >> work - because:
>> >>
>> >> - WOL "wakes" only from the "Standby" state,
>> >> - and the "Standby" state depends on memory data being kept alive.
>> >> - When you lose the mains power to the system, the memory data is lost
>> >> - and the system power controller recognizes it is no longer in the "Standby"
>> >> state
>> >> - hence there will be no WOL function available...
>> >
>> >WOL and "boot on power restore" are two different things. What you say is
>> >true for WOL, but with power removed, the real time clock in the BIOS is still
>> >active. All that is needed, is a circuit to turn on the power supply when
>> >mains power is restored. Some BIOSs do have this circuit. The BIOS can
>> >then respond to a WOL request.
>> >
>> >Virg Wall
>>
>> No, that won't give you WOL. The bios switch you're referring to cannot return
>> the system to the *Standby* state, so there's no way WOL will function.
>
>It doesn't need WOL--the system is fully up.
And that's *not* WOL, which was the whole point of the thread, eh?
That's simply "Power Up after AC loss", already noted...
/daytripper
|