We have a "single subnet LAN" which includes VPN links and I have had the
same experience.
It is the nature of VPN. VPN has a high over head and runs on links that are
reletively slow compared to CAT5 & 6 LAN links. I have never seen a "fast"
VPN unless you run it over a T3 or something. It usually works fine for
Client-Server Applications (Outlook-Exchange) or with some type of Terminal
Emulation (Terminal Services, Citrix) but not so great with direct file
transfers. Much of the additional overhaed comes from the required
Encapsulation that creates what we think of as the "Tunnel".
Keep in mind that the remote client becomes part of the local LAN when
connected, therefore the slower VPN link is subject to all the LAN Broadcast
that are typical on a LAN. Broadcasts that aren't even noticable on a 100mbs
CAT5 link could be overwhelming on a slower 1.4+mbs T1 link. You could
setup a separate subnet just for VPN "dial-ins" so that the Router between
the two subnets would protect the VPN link from all that stuff flying around
the LAN and would allow the VPN link to remain "quiet" and open for
important traffic. That's why Cisco often refers to a router as a "Broadcast
Firewall". When we split up our LAN into smaller "segments" I believe this
will help our situation, I'm just waiting for cooperation from our other
sites so I dont' step on them by using addresses that one of them is already
using.
--
Phillip Windell [MCP, MVP, CCNA]
www.wandtv.com
"David Cuneo Justin" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:c86901c3eecf$cc4bda70$(E-Mail Removed)...
> I have a SBS 2003 setup with VPN connectivity.
> Currently, when I connect up to the server, I can use my
> exchange via outlook fine. However, If I try to copy a
> file over the network, it's extremely slow, to the point
> that it's not usable. I have done a search in the
> knowledge base for vpn troubleshooting with no luck. Has
> anyone else run into this problem?
>
> Any and all help is appreciated.