since the 192 and a 10.1.1.0 are 2 different networks, it would stand to
reason you need to set up a static route in order to conect a seprate
network together
just a thought to mull
KK
"Bob" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:Xns96A99C4BDFA8Apcahb@208.49.80.60...
> I hope to explain this well enough and keep my level of stupid to a
> minimum.
>
> 2 sites are connected thru a T1, and the networks at both ends are
> working.
> 192.168.1.0 can see 192.168.2.0 fine.
> 1 cisco router at both sites
>
> A 3rd site was added with no physical connection between them.
> We have a gateway to gateway vpn setup from the 3rd site 10.1.1.0 to the
> 192.168.1.0 network which is working, using a Linksys RV082 router at
> the 10.1.1.0 site, and a DLink vpn router on the 192.168.1.0 site.
>
> We are having trouble getting the 192.168.2.0 network connected to the
> 10.1.1.0 network. There is a static route from the 192.168.2.0 to
> 192.168.1.0. At this point, we are not sure which way to go. We cannot
> get get the Linksys client to connect to the 10.1.1.0 linksys router as
> well.
>
> I have likely left important info out but hope to get some help or a
> direction if possible, Thanks in advance.
>
> Bob
>
|
Similar Threads
Linear Mode
