On Wed, 26 Apr 2006 13:59:39 +0100, David26
<(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
>Andrew Hodgson Wrote:
>> On Wed, 28 Dec 2005 00:12:05 +0000, Plusnet Support Team
>> (E-Mail Removed) wrote:
This is going back a bit so nothing else was tried, but just wanting
to post a comment:
[...]
>Andrew,
>BT seem to think that IPSEC VPN can be enabled on the Voyager 2110 by
>using Port Forwarding.
I saw that article on the support website after contacting BT and
laughed, I implemented it (as well as putting the machine in the DMZ
host setup - I think, but still no good.
The issue is not the VPN server needing to contact the remote client
through the router, which usually works anyway without port
forwarding, because the connection is initiated from within the
router, so replies are allowed through. The problem is with the
actual packet that is sent out from the client to the VPN gateway,
which contains the internal IP of the machine, which the VPN gateway
tries to contact. Obviously, without VPN passthrough (which is where
the router modifies the packet to change the IP address from the
client private address to the router's public IP address), the gateway
won't be able to reach that machine through that IP address, so the
connection fails.
I saw sometime in February that there is an updated firmware for this
model, who knows whether it will sort out the problem! Anyway, it is
on the banned list now for the forseeable future.
Andrew.
--
Andrew Hodgson in Bromyard, Herefordshire, UK.
My Email: use <andrew at hodgsonfamily dot org>.