I'm not sure why you were told that. Many legacy applications rely on
NetBIOS, and if you run any of those apps, and you need to provide name
resolution over a subnetted network, then WINS would be the best way to
handle it.
Chris
Andrew" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news

DF28BFC-392C-49ED-8C44-(E-Mail Removed)...
> Well I was told by Microsoft when we migrated that we don't even need WINS
> installed on our network so I just never installed a WINS server after we
> retired the old Windows 2000 DC.
>
> Is that the problem?
>
> "Chris Leiter" wrote:
>
>> So what's handling WINS?
>> Your problem seems to be with NetBIOS name resolution.
>>
>> Chris
>>
>> "Andrew" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
>> news:E9032ABC-C263-4029-9C86-(E-Mail Removed)...
>> > We just recently migrated our Windows 2000 domain controller to a
>> > Windows
>> > 2003 Server. We have employees that remotely work by initiating a VPN
>> > tunnel
>> > through our PIX firewall.
>> >
>> > Before we migrated, people were able to access network resources from
>> > their
>> > remote computer by typing something like this in Start > Run:
>> > \\server-name\shared folder.
>> >
>> > But ever since we migrated to a Windows 2003 domain controller, we can
>> > only
>> > access anything remotely by typing: \\server-ip-address\folder share.
>> >
>> > Any ideas why this is?
>> >
>> > The original Windows 2000 DC was also the networks DNS/WINS server, but
>> > now
>> > that server has been demoted, and the Windows 2003 server handles all
>> > the
>> > DNS
>> > stuff. The Windows 2003 server has a different IP address than the
>> > Windows
>> > 2000 server did.
>> >
>> > I have made all VPN configuration setting changes in the PIX so that it
>> > accomodates the new IP address change.
>>
>>
>>