NAT does not act as a DHCP server by default. It only does it if you
specifically give it a batch of IP addresses to use for this purpose.Whether
you use that option for your private IP subnet or set up a new scope in your
existing DHCP server is up to you.
Neteng wrote:
> 1. No, that is DHCP's job. You might want to review RFC1631 for the
> operation of NAT.
> http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc1631.html
>
> 2. Here's a link on configuring NAT
> http://www.windowsnetworking.com/art...AT-router.html
>
>
> "Fernando" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
> news:%23%(E-Mail Removed)...
>> Hello,
>>
>> See if someone can help me out in here:
>>
>> Scenario
>> ---------
>>
>> Windows 2003 server with two NIC
>>
>> NIC1 has a public IP range, lets say, 161.56.31.0 [255.255.252.0]
>> (The public IP chosen is an example)
>> NIC2 has a private IP, 192.168.0.0 [255.255.255.0]
>> NAT service running on Windows 2003 server
>>
>> NIC1 is working on my VLAN1 and NIC2 on my VLAN2, in other words,
>> NIC2 is connected to the port of a switch (3COM 3300) which is
>> configured to work on VLAN2.
>>
>>
>> Problem
>> ---------
>>
>> I'm trying to give access to client machines giving a private IP by
>> working on VLAN2, but then accesing the network doing NAT to VLAN1
>> (public IP). I'm strungling configuring the NAT service!
>>
>>
>> Question1
>> ----------
>>
>> Does the NAT service lease IPs? In other words, does it have any DHCP
>> functionality or does it relies on an external DHCP?
>>
>> Question2
>> -----------
>>
>> In case I have to enable the DHCP server, would it clash with the
>> other DHCP server which I have on the network, running on another
>> server, leasing public IPs
>>
>>
>> Any ideas?
>>
>> Thanks you all,
>>
>> Fernando.