"Mike" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:j1GHh.56154$(E-Mail Removed)...
>
> "Jono" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
> news
gEHh.128$(E-Mail Removed).. .
>> Mike wrote:
>>> In the
>>> meantime I can dial 1280 to phone out. Now why don't Virgin put that on
>>> their website help files, would have saved time.
>>>
>>
>> That would mean them effectively saying "to use a competitor to route
>> your calls, simply prefix any call with 1280" - Do you think that's
>> likely?
>
> I eventaully thought'sod it' and phoned Virgin on their 0906 number at 25p
> per minute to tell them they had again cocked up my telephone line and
> yes, the lady I spoke to asked if I knew that I could dial 1280 to make
> outgoing calls. Obviously saves them money if I pay BT for calls that I
> have already paid virgin for.
> It is obviously going to be better to go back to BT in the long term as
> you can contact them for free, unlike virgin who rake in 25p per minute
> everytime they cock up their service. Just wondering now how bad does it
> have to get before I can cancel without paying the cancellation fee.
> ================================================== ===============================
Sounds to me like they have not kept to the contract, therefore, in theory
you should be able to leave as they have not fulfilled their part of the
(verbal?) contract.
I too am with Virgin, on option 2, I was not told at 'sign up' that all
calls would have to be routed via Virgin at all times, they (Virgin)charged
a 6p connection fee daytime, BT only 3p I believe.
I wish I had been told all this before sign up. One thing though, as opposed
to NTL whom I was with before, they do actually answer the telephone and if
you speak loud enough they do listen!!!
Brian (Huddersfield)