In comp.os.linux.misc Antoine EMERIT <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
> (E-Mail Removed) (Peter T. Breuer) ?crivait
> news:jlcrd2-(E-Mail Removed):
>
> > In comp.os.linux.misc David Filmer
> > <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
> >> This may sound crazy... but can I use software RAID to create an
> >> array of drives where the drives are NFS-mounted over the network
> >> (instead of locally connected)?
> >
> > No. You want nbd or enbd, not nfs. Nfs is a filesystem, not a device.
>
> If you want to be "fun", you may try to use a large file on the nfs
> filesystem and mount using the loop device in your raid array.
Won't work. Or at least loop over nfs never used to work - if it works
now I would be both delighted and surprised.
> I said "to be fun", not "to be serious".
Well, I don't really see the difference ... oh, you are thinking of
speed, reliability, etc? OK, yes, that would be "fun".
> > Not really, no. But then you don't want what you say you want. You
> > mean "network attached disk", yet you are saying "networked file
> > system". The two are different.
>
> Yes, what is your purpose indead ? You wan to mount a copy of the same
> data from two replicated nfs server ?
He wanted what he said: "RAID over several remote disks (instead of
local disks)".
Peter