>IMHO people make the whole networking thing a lot more complicated
>than it needs to be.
That really depends on your needs. Peer to peer is cheaper but cost
saving is relative - wireless routers are so cheap these days
especially when you weigh up the time you are going to spend using the
Internet. Having a router I believe makes things more simple not more
complicated and more easy to manage even with just 2 PC's.
I have personally used both solutions (peer to peer and router) and
give support on both set ups. To be able to be PC independent is v.
convenient. The 'router' route makes for a much more reliable internet
browsing experience. IMHO its easier to set up an 'internet sharing'
network with a router (wired or wireless) than peer to peer and much
more versatile.
I would say that if your use is going to be infrequent, go for the peer
to peer using microsofts ICS. Otherwise if you are a more serious
Internet user then put a router at the heart of your set up.
Darren
http://www.netgadgets.co.uk