>
> Many trigger off a serial connection from the UPS to the computer.
I don't really have an issue with triggering on the master server. That
part is fully functional and works great.
>
> I am a bit confused. If the dmz is not connected to the internal machines
> at all, then there is no way they can tell it anything. I think I need more
> info on your topology.
I have no problem contacting the dmz machine from the internal network.
All the UPS software I have seen requires that the client connects to
the master, so my dmz machine would have to contact my internal network
which I am trying to avoid.
I have a typical dmz setup:
http://www.linuxjournal.com/articles...415/4415f2.png
The firewall is set so there is open access from the internal network
to the dmz, but not the other way around.
> >I have also read about creating a shutdown user that when logged in,
> >would shut the server down. Not the best solution, but one that is
> >possible and would meet my needs.
>
> No idea how you would log on as the shutdown use if that dmz machine is
> disconnected from everything.
> How does the dmz sit and listen? What can it listen to?
Disconnected from everything? What ever gave you that impression? I
stated it doesn't have access to the internal machines or the firewall
- something you want to achieve with a dmz. You don't want a hacker who
has comprimised your dmz to be able to start hacking your firewall or
internal network.
If setup properly, the firewall should be transparent to everyone that
uses it but still pass traffic that has been allowed by the firewall
rules.
>
> You can certainly create a daemon on some port whose sole role in life is
> to listen for a message telling it to shutdown and then shutting down the
> machine. ( better probably to just have xinetd run the program. Of course
> you probably want more than just a tinkle on the port as otherwise I could
> shut down you r machine by just tickling that port)
That's something I'm looking into now.