Networking Forums

Networking Forums > Computer Networking > Broadband > Unexpected results with Draytek Vigor 2800v

Reply
Thread Tools Display Modes

Unexpected results with Draytek Vigor 2800v

 
 
Adam Lipscombe
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      10-10-2006, 02:45 PM
Folks,


I bought a Draytek Vigor 2800v because according to everything I have read this a very good router,
and I need the unlocked VOIP functionality.


But I find that is connects at only 75% of the speed of the BT business hub (aka 2Wire 2700) that it
replaced. Typically the 2wire connects at 2528/448 while the Vigor only connects at 1880/448.

That said the actual download speed as measured by http://www.adslguide.org.uk/tools/speedtest.asp
seems consistent at @ 1300.

I am been in touch with Draytek support (excellent) and have tried the various firmware flavours
that they offer. No significant difference.


I would have expected the Vigor to be at least as fast as the 2Wire.

It looks like the 2wire is a better device, at least for my line. Sadly the VOIP function in it is
locked to BT.



I assume the speed figures reported by the 2 devices are accurate.
Does anyone know what could cause this difference?



Thanks -Adam

 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
 
Alex Heney
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      10-10-2006, 04:22 PM
On Tue, 10 Oct 2006 15:45:25 +0100, Adam Lipscombe
<(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:

>Folks,
>
>
>I bought a Draytek Vigor 2800v because according to everything I have read this a very good router,
>and I need the unlocked VOIP functionality.
>
>
>But I find that is connects at only 75% of the speed of the BT business hub (aka 2Wire 2700) that it
>replaced. Typically the 2wire connects at 2528/448 while the Vigor only connects at 1880/448.
>
>That said the actual download speed as measured by http://www.adslguide.org.uk/tools/speedtest.asp
>seems consistent at @ 1300.
>
>I am been in touch with Draytek support (excellent) and have tried the various firmware flavours
>that they offer. No significant difference.
>
>
>I would have expected the Vigor to be at least as fast as the 2Wire.
>
>It looks like the 2wire is a better device, at least for my line. Sadly the VOIP function in it is
>locked to BT.
>
>
>
>I assume the speed figures reported by the 2 devices are accurate.
>Does anyone know what could cause this difference?
>


Probably the vigor will have a more stable connection speed.

I found a similar situation when I moved from a Netgear to a Vigor
2600VG. The connection speed dropped from usually being around 28-2900
to usually around 21-2300Kb.

But while the netgear had required rebooting several times per day,
the vigor has not required rebooting once in the several months I have
had it.

I think that is a fair trade off personally :-)
--
Alex Heney, Global Villager
Man who speaks with forked tongue should not kiss balloon
To reply by email, my address is alexATheneyDOTplusDOTcom
 
Reply With Quote
 
Ian
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      10-10-2006, 06:37 PM
I have a 2800G which is extremely reliable and gets a contant 4Mb. Have you
had a look at the maxdnrate and codinggain settings? These can help to
increase speed but may also cause some issues with performance.


"Adam Lipscombe" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:(E-Mail Removed)...
> Folks,
>
>
> I bought a Draytek Vigor 2800v because according to everything I have read
> this a very good router, and I need the unlocked VOIP functionality.
>
>
> But I find that is connects at only 75% of the speed of the BT business
> hub (aka 2Wire 2700) that it replaced. Typically the 2wire connects at
> 2528/448 while the Vigor only connects at 1880/448.
>
> That said the actual download speed as measured by
> http://www.adslguide.org.uk/tools/speedtest.asp seems consistent at @
> 1300.
>
> I am been in touch with Draytek support (excellent) and have tried the
> various firmware flavours that they offer. No significant difference.
>
>
> I would have expected the Vigor to be at least as fast as the 2Wire.
>
> It looks like the 2wire is a better device, at least for my line. Sadly
> the VOIP function in it is locked to BT.
>
>
>
> I assume the speed figures reported by the 2 devices are accurate.
> Does anyone know what could cause this difference?
>
>
>
> Thanks -Adam
>



 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Draytek Vigor 2900VG henrik_m_k@hotmail.com Network Routers 4 02-25-2008 11:42 AM
Draytek Vigor 2910 jas0n Broadband 0 09-22-2006 09:49 PM
DrayTek VIGOR 2800VG Nigel Molesworth Broadband 2 01-24-2006 11:33 AM
Vigor Draytek 2200Wplus David Quinton Broadband 11 10-13-2004 06:40 AM
Draytek Vigor 2600we with WEP cotd Broadband 9 10-31-2003 08:36 AM



1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11