[UK-Bug] News .. Eclipse go flexible.

Eclipse offer flexible boostable ADSL.

"Today sees Eclipse Internet release its new FLEX product suite - with
its key feature permitting the temporary boosting of the subscribers
Internet connection (obviously, where available), facilitating faster
downloads. Also on the cards in a new 250kpbs product."

http://snipurl.com/6s90

--
Regards
Andy M Jenkins

UK Broadband Usergroup http://www.uk-bug.net

Andy M Jenkins wrote:

> Eclipse offer flexible boostable ADSL.
>
> "Today sees Eclipse Internet release its new FLEX product suite - with
> its key feature permitting the temporary boosting of the subscribers
> Internet connection (obviously, where available), facilitating faster
> downloads. Also on the cards in a new 250kpbs product."

Eclipse would do well to sort out their current billing problems before
introducing more.

--
Now Playing: Kurt Nilsen - She`s So High [224kbps ogg]

Does any one else agree with me that the reason there is a uk.telecom and a
uk.telecom.broadband group is so that the two topics are discussed in
separate groups? Could we ask Andy not to post in both groups?
John Rogers
"Andy M Jenkins" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:(E-Mail Removed)...
> Eclipse offer flexible boostable ADSL.
>
> "Today sees Eclipse Internet release its new FLEX product suite - with
> its key feature permitting the temporary boosting of the subscribers
> Internet connection (obviously, where available), facilitating faster
> downloads. Also on the cards in a new 250kpbs product."
>
> http://snipurl.com/6s90
>
> --
> Regards
> Andy M Jenkins
>
> UK Broadband Usergroup http://www.uk-bug.net

John Rogers wrote:
> Does any one else agree with me that the reason there is a uk.telecom and a
> uk.telecom.broadband group is so that the two topics are discussed in
> separate groups? Could we ask Andy not to post in both groups?
> John Rogers

Hi John,

If you read my other post in u.t - you'll see the appology.

--
Regards
Andy M Jenkins

UK Broadband Usergroup http://www.uk-bug.net

On Tue, 1 Jun 2004 12:50:17 +0100, "John Rogers"
<(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:

>Does any one else agree with me that the reason there is a uk.telecom and a
>uk.telecom.broadband group is so that the two topics are discussed in
>separate groups? Could we ask Andy not to post in both groups?

Or in uk.media.broadband where it is also OT.
--
Andrew. To email unscramble (E-Mail Removed) & remove spamtrap.
Help make Usenet a better place: English is read downwards,
please don't top post. Trim messages to quote only relevant text.
Check groups.google.com before asking a question.

x-no-archive: yes
Andrew wrote: news:(E-Mail Removed)

> On Tue, 1 Jun 2004 12:50:17 +0100, "John Rogers"
> <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
>
>> Does any one else agree with me that the reason there is a uk.telecom
>> and a uk.telecom.broadband group is so that the two topics are discussed
>> in separate groups? Could we ask Andy not to post in both groups?
>
> Or in uk.media.broadband where it is also OT.

what's more, crossposting to uk.media.broadband and more than one other
group is against the charter of uk.media.broadband.
http://makeashorterlink.com/?X2A952478