I'm trying to figure out if I need an Access Point, or if a wireless
router can be used in my application. For some reason, even though
APs have fewer capabilities, at the moment they cost more than
routers.
I have DSL with a routed connection, using a Cisco 675 router. The
675 is my router, DHCP server and NAT box, to which I have connected
a 4-port wired switch.
I appears that what I really need is an Access Point, which I would
just plug into a port on my switch, and then I could access the
internet and the other hard-wired hosts on my "network".
It also appears that I could buy a wireless router, many of which
include 4-port switches. I would then have added another hop in my
network, but I could get rid of my current switch. I presume I'd
still be able to access the internet and my existing network from a
wirelessly connected PC.
Some have suggested that by connecting my 675 to the wireless router
by way of the wireless router's "uplink" port, I could bypass the
wireless router function and use it as an access point. Since many
wireless routers are cheaper than access points at the moment, this
is attractive, if it actually works. Does it?
--
Bert Hyman | St. Paul, MN |
(E-Mail Removed)