"Hamad bin Turki al Salami" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:(E-Mail Removed). ..
> Travis M. wrote:
>> "Hamad bin Turki al Salami" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
>> news:(E-Mail Removed). ..
>>> I have a wireless G Linksys WRT54G router in my house. The signal
>>> doesn't penetrate everywhere, so I'm thinking of getting another
>>> wireless router (say a NetGear WGR614) and making a wired connection
>>> with an ethernet cable from one of the ethernet ports on the Linksys
>>> to the WAN connection on the NetGear. Then I should have two wireless
>>> lans in my house and I think that together I should get good
>>> coverage.
>>>
>>> Will this work? I just want to run it by this group in case there's
>>> something obviously wrong with my plan.
>>
>>
>> What you want is a "wireless access point".
>>
>
> Isn't a wireless router like the NetGear WGR614 a wireless access point,
> together with an ethernet hub? I could actually use the extra ethernet
> ports, so I'd rather have them than just a wireless access point.
>
> Is there a different kind of wireless access point than what's contained
> in a wireless router like the WGR614?
>
> Of course, it would be nice to be able to "roam" between the areas
> covered by the two routers, so I'd like for them to both be providing
> the same interface, if I can do that. But that's not essential.
> Generally, I sit in one place, so I don't mind if I have to reconnect
> if I move to a new area of the house occasionally.
Yes, it is. Sort of. Set up the second router without DHCP and connect a
port on the first router to a LAN port on the second, not the WAN port.
And yes, wireless access points are available separately.
|