Well, yes and no.
Since nothing was adding up, I kept thinking it had to be some sort of ARP
or ethernet weirdness. I cleared ARP caches, restarted all switches,
restarted the VPN connections (IPSec), restarted all IPSec services on the
routers, and no change. When a scheduled down-time came up last weekend, I
restarted the remote VPN server/router and that did the trick.
So I'm still guessing it's some sort of ARPish issue. Unfortunately, I
couldn't find the actual issue so I'll have to chalk it up to black magic.
"MMT" wrote:
> Have you or anyone else found a solution to this problem since the last post?
>
>
> "Rollie" wrote:
>
> > No, neither server can telnet to port 135 on the other machine. They can
> > both telnet to 135 on machines on the remote subnets, though.
> >
> > This made me think perhaps it was a weird ARP issue. Cleared the ARP caches
> > and no change.
> >
> > I ran "netstat -an | findstr remoteipaddress" on each server. On the member
> > server, I got nothing. On the DC, it said SYN_SENT to ports 139 and 445 on
> > the member server. I don't know if that helps or not but it makes me lean
> > towards the member server is at fault.
> >
> > Other than that, I suppose it could be one of the VPN servers. It's a
> > net-to-net connection though and nothing else is having trouble so I don't
> > really know what it would be that would be this specific.
> >
> >
> > "Robert L (MS-MVP)" wrote:
> >
> > > In many cases, system error 53 is firewall or name resolution issue. Since
> > > net view ip has the same error, I would focus on firewall. Can you ping the
> > > remote server by IP? If yes, can you telnet port 135?
> > >
> >