In article <c82str$pib$(E-Mail Removed)>, Al Dykes <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
:What kinds of interference is 802.11g subject to ? Is avoiding
:interfernece a reason to set up "g" for a new LAN even if
:it costs a little more than "b".
11g uses many sub-carriers but holds each symbol for longer than 11b.
11g is thus more resistant to short bursts of inteference. Mostly,
though, the design difference was to reduce multipath problems, which
aren't really "interference" as such.
Both 11b and 11g have difficulty with continuous noise in the band,
such as might be caused by microwave ovens. The "power levels" 1-10
in microwave ovens are sometimes implimented as duty cycles in 1/10th of
a second. That means that the wave is held "on" for times that are
very long relative to the symbol rate for 11b or 11g, so the signal
can get washed out for both of them.
--
This signature intentionally left... Oh, darn!
|