CJB wrote:
> I've just had an aggressive demand from our 'friends' the TVL for a new
> laptop I've just purchased with Windows Media Centre and a t.v. card.
> However the t.v. reception and display is so damned awful that I am
> seriously thinking of getting the t.v. card removed. This test was at a
> location that is IS licensed for t.v. reception, but anyway I'm damned
> if I'm going to pay for a second license just so that I can use the
> laptop elsewhere - even as a simple computer.
>
> So please could folk advise me:
>
> 1/ is a license necessary for a t.v. equipped laptop that is used at
> another location even if the t.v. feature itself is not actually being
> used (prior to removal of the t.v. card),
No. But, can you show that you are not using it for that purpose? Are you
'recieving' the tv signal? If not no, but being able to do so at the single
click of a mouse might not be convincing...
> 2/ if the laptop has WiFi is it necessary to have a license for the
> location where the WiFi router is situated if the laptop is used in
> another location that is / is NOT licensed
probably..... If you try to simplify it down, if you had one aerial on the
roof, and that fed four different apartments, they would all need tv
licenses, if they all recieved tv.
> Specifically I want to set up a local free WiFi service for a block of
> flats, but do not wish to pay for a t.v. license specifically for the
> room in which the WiFi router will be located.
think of the router as the aerial, and the laptop as the tv.
> Many thanks - CJB.
Gaz
|