On Fri, 17 Nov 2006 17:08:32 +1300, Peter Lowrie <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
>Does anyone have direct experience with DEC Tulip NIC's?
Yup, chucked them in favour of Intel pro/100 with e100 driver :^)
Okay, still have a couple around to play with...
a)
Linux Tulip driver version 1.1.13 (May 11, 2002)
PCI: Found IRQ 9 for device 0000:01:07.0
PCI: Sharing IRQ 9 with 0000:00:01.0
tulip0: MII transceiver #1 config 1000 status 782d advertising 01e1.
eth2: Digital DS21140 Tulip rev 34 at cca3cc00, 00:00:E8:4F:4D:3D, IRQ 9.
b)
Linux Tulip driver version 1.1.13 (May 11, 2002)
ACPI: PCI Interrupt Link [LNKC] enabled at IRQ 3
PCI: setting IRQ 3 as level-triggered
ACPI: PCI Interrupt 0000:00:0f.0[A] -> Link [LNKC] -> GSI 3 (level, low) -> IRQ 3
tulip0: EEPROM default media type Autosense.
tulip0: Index #0 - Media MII (#11) described by a 21140 MII PHY (1) block.
tulip0: MII transceiver #1 config 1000 status 7809 advertising 01e1.
eth2: Digital DS21140 Tulip rev 34 at d8d6c000, 00:00:E8:4A:A0:C8, IRQ 3.
....
eth2: Setting full-duplex based on MII#1 link partner capability of 01e1.
Both boxen running 2.6.16.32.
Up at 100Mbps with crossed cable to another tulip, also links at 100Mbps
with Intel e100 or a 3com 3c59x. Casual test, nothing beyond 'modprobe
tulip', followed by ifconfig for a ping test.
>Do you know *exactly* what to stick in after "options"?
Nada, zip, zilch. No option line needed, use default auto-sense.
Check what device you're sharing interrupts with, you don't want it
sharing with another NIC. Try changing the NIC to another PCI slot.
Have you tried with / without kernel PCI shared memory option? I have
that turned on.
Which kernel you running?
Grant.
--
http://bugsplatter.mine.nu/