"Amanda" <(E-Mail Removed)> hath wroth:
>I got those from the DSL provider. I calle from the same phone line
>that DSL was on. Sort of pretended that I was my bro - the account
>holder - and wasn't asked any personal question. Was just asked how was
>the payment usually made. My sister is the one who paid and with check
>and I said, "We.....".
Personal questions? Ummm.... what manner of hot line were you
calling?
>After talking with the tech support when setting up 2WIRE, from Control
>Panel, I clicked on "Wireless Network Setup Wizard", put network name
>(SSID) and had a choice to let the computer creat the key (WEP/WAP) or
>create manually. It didn't specificy whether it was WEP or WAP.
I think (not sure) that it's WPA for the 1800HG/HW.
>So if I want to set up the wireless security, I need to go to
>Configuration Set up page for the 2WIRE which btw, can be reached at
>"http://home"?
I didn't know that. I usually use 172.16.0.254 (or something like
that) found with the IPCONFIG command.
>What's the different between setting up wireless network
>via that set up page and setting it using Control Panel's "Wireless
>Network Setup Wizard"?
More options. More control. More ways to screw things up. I've
never bother to even try the Windoze Network wizard.
>>The difference is that Comcast does NOT need a login and password, while
>> SBC does.
>
>Is that difference just a part of technology applied or is that because
>the ISP provider makes it that way?
Both. PPPoE does not in itself require a login and password. However,
PBI/SBC/AT&T wants the user to authenticate. This is a subtle
difference between the SBC system of authenticating the user, and
other systems of authenticating the connection (using the MAC
address). From RFC2516:
PPP over Ethernet (PPPoE) provides the ability to connect a network
of hosts over a simple bridging access device to a remote Access
Concentrator. With this model, each host utilizes it's own PPP stack
and the user is presented with a familiar user interface. Access
control, billing and type of service can be done on a per-user,
rather than a per-site, basis.
At one time, Comcast was authenticating by MAC address, but now uses
the DOCSIS BPI (baseline privacy interface) which also encrypts
everything. In effect, they authenticate the cable modem, not the
user. The problem with this is if the modem dies, a replacement
doesn't automagically function without first calling support. This is
not the case with PPPoE, where any DSL modem will work. The PPPoE
login and passwd can be in buried in the modem or the router depending
on hardware supplied. Of course, all this authentication is
ridiculous because the DSL number is not portable and is automatically
authenticated by the wiring at the CO (central office) to the DSLAM
(digital subscriber line access multiplexor). This is one reason why
I think PPPoE sucks.
>> If you just want to try it, leave the wireless settings alone.
>I don't have a wirless laptop or desktop at the moment to try.
Borrow one to try out the wireless.
>Since he said
>"better not do any wirless security", would the network name (SSID)
>appear as the name of the DSL account holder if I had not done using
>Control Panel's "Wireless Network Setup Wizard"?
If you left the SSID at the default, it would be "2wireXXX" where XXX
are the last 3 digits of the MAC address. There's nothing sacred
about this SSID. If you changed it, there's no problem. However, I
would not set it to the user account login name.
>I would have gone
>back to the "http://home" page and checked if I were nto terribly tired
>at the time. Now no one is at home over that house to open the door.
If you had a wireless laptop, you could sit outside the house and hack
your way in. The fun part is explaining to the police what you're
doing sitting in a car, late at night, pounding on a laptop.
--
Jeff Liebermann
(E-Mail Removed)
150 Felker St #D
http://www.LearnByDestroying.com
Santa Cruz CA 95060
http://802.11junk.com
Skype: JeffLiebermann AE6KS 831-336-2558