On Sat, 17 Dec 2005 19:36:06 GMT, "__spc__" <s p a m t i m e @ n t l w
o r l d . c o m> wrote:
>
>"Jerry Park" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
>news:joYof.3351$(E-Mail Removed)...
>> Go Tyler wrote:
>>> Which is better: aes or tkip? I can never get my wireless connected when
>>> I set it for aes. It only connects with tkip, so I might not have any
>>> choice. But should I care anyway?
>> Generally, a wireless router or access point will support only one at a
>> time -- either AES or TKIP.
>>
>> I prefer AES myself because it is a very good encryption algorithm. Use
>> TKIP at home and AES at work (my home system contains a client card which
>> doesn't support AES).
>>
>> Either is OK. No reports that either can be broken (except when using a
>> weak key). So use a good key and don't worry.
>AES is WPA2 - not all hardware supports this (my desktop's WiFi PCI card
>doesn't.)
So, switch to Windoze Wireless Zero Config and install the WPA2
supplicant.
|
http://support.microsoft.com/?id=893357
|
http://www.microsoft.com/technet/com...uy/cg0505.mspx
Note that it currently does not support all the new and improved
methods of authentication. Currently, only EAP-TLS is supported.
|
http://blogs.zdnet.com/Ou/?p=64
--
Jeff Liebermann
(E-Mail Removed)
150 Felker St #D
http://www.LearnByDestroying.com
Santa Cruz CA 95060
http://802.11junk.com
Skype: JeffLiebermann AE6KS 831-336-2558